2013 Ieee Conference on Information and Communication Technologies 2013
DOI: 10.1109/cict.2013.6558306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Texture analysis of non-uniform images using GLCM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Textures are characteristic intensity variations that originate from the roughness of an object surface. The texture of an image is classified into first-order, second-order, and higher-order statistics [57]. There are a variety of methods of extracting texture features including Local Binary Patterns (LBP), the Canny edge detection, discrete wavelet transform, and gray level occurrence matrix, among others [58][59][60].…”
Section: Texture Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Textures are characteristic intensity variations that originate from the roughness of an object surface. The texture of an image is classified into first-order, second-order, and higher-order statistics [57]. There are a variety of methods of extracting texture features including Local Binary Patterns (LBP), the Canny edge detection, discrete wavelet transform, and gray level occurrence matrix, among others [58][59][60].…”
Section: Texture Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metode Gray Level Co-occurence Matrix (GLCM) adalah salah satu metode yang membangkitkan fitur berdasarkan tekstur dari suatu citra. Salah satu kelebihan GLCM adalah tidak terpengaruh oleh illuminasi citra yang tidak merata [7]. GLCM bekerja dengan mendeteksi posisi dari piksel yang mempunyai kesamaan level keabuan.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…34 However, limited by image rotation and external illumination variations, the performance of single texture extraction methods was often unsatisfactory. 35 LBP could capture local details, but it was easy to lose global information. 36 GLCM was less accurate in the region near the class boundary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%