2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.10.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Texture-based descriptors for writer identification and verification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
55
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding Arabic handwriting recognition, a high word recognition rate of 93.37 % [217] is reported on the IFN/ENIT database. Writer identification systems have been most evaluated and compared on the IAM database and a highest identification rate of 96.7 % is reported in [218] with one sample of each of the 657 writers in training and one in the test set. Like Arabic handwriting recognition, the writer identification systems targeting Arabic handwritings mostly employ the IFN/ENIT database.…”
Section: Experimental Protocols Evaluation Metrics and State-of-the-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding Arabic handwriting recognition, a high word recognition rate of 93.37 % [217] is reported on the IFN/ENIT database. Writer identification systems have been most evaluated and compared on the IAM database and a highest identification rate of 96.7 % is reported in [218] with one sample of each of the 657 writers in training and one in the test set. Like Arabic handwriting recognition, the writer identification systems targeting Arabic handwritings mostly employ the IFN/ENIT database.…”
Section: Experimental Protocols Evaluation Metrics and State-of-the-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The arrangement of these databases have been explained in Section 4. Using our proposed BDCT approach, a Top 1 accuracy of 97.2% on the IAM database has been achieved, which outperforms the nearest best performing system of (Bertolini et al, 2013) by 0.5%. For the CVL database, 99.6% of Top 1 accuracy has been reached by our system.…”
Section: Comparison Of Our Proposed System With Existing Workmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…It was demonstrated that using multiple codebooks to represent every writer produced better results than by using a single codebook approach. (Bertolini et al, 2013) considered the handwriting text as a texture and used Local Binary Patterns (LBP) and Local Phase Quantization (LPQ) to extract textural features for writer verification and identification. They built upon a previously reported work using the dissimilarity framework approach by (Hanusiak et al, 2012) and extended the idea to writer identification.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this line of action, Bertolini et al (2013) exhibited high writer identification rates by using a fusion of two statistical features; Local Binary Pattern (LBP) and Local Phase Quantization (LPQ). Hannad et al (2016) introduced one more statistical feature Local Phase Quantization (LTP) in addition to LBP and LPQ.…”
Section: Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%