2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2020.140047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Texture control to reduce yield strength anisotropy in the third generation aluminum-copper-lithium alloy: Experiments and modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, compared with the PAN and PA350 samples, the PA510 and PA400 samples had weaker grain orientation and smaller grain size (about 40 µm). In general, Al-Cu-Li had high anisotropy in strength, and its strong texture was easy to form in the hot forming process [30]. In this paper, as a complex strong rheological forming process, the composite spinning-extrusion forming had higher sensitivity to the forming window of Al-Cu-Li alloy.…”
Section: Mechanical Properties Of Cylindrical Parts Under Different S...mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In addition, compared with the PAN and PA350 samples, the PA510 and PA400 samples had weaker grain orientation and smaller grain size (about 40 µm). In general, Al-Cu-Li had high anisotropy in strength, and its strong texture was easy to form in the hot forming process [30]. In this paper, as a complex strong rheological forming process, the composite spinning-extrusion forming had higher sensitivity to the forming window of Al-Cu-Li alloy.…”
Section: Mechanical Properties Of Cylindrical Parts Under Different S...mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The optical microstructure of the alloy in different states was analysed and presented in figure 2. Microstructure reveals that grain morphology of the alloy in SHT and SHT + aged states was mainly in the form of irregular pancakes type recrystallized grains depicting the typical Al-Cu-Li alloy [25].…”
Section: Microstructure Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PS is 110.2 MPa of the sheet stretched along TD, and the value of RD reaches 142.9 MPa under 440 • C-1 s −1 . According to the previous studies [24,25], to better characterize the evolution of PS along RD and TD, the PS anisotropy can be defined as the difference value (D-value) between the PS along the RD and TD divided by the minimum PS value (PSmin), as shown in Equation (1). Similar to the PS, the EL anisotropy can be defined by Equation (2).…”
Section: Flow Behavior and Mechanical Anisotropymentioning
confidence: 99%