2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0040-6090(99)00778-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Texture manipulation of CuInSe 2 thin films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
51
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
7
51
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is reported that the preferred orientation of CIS is related to the substrate material, precursor orientation, and process conditions [18,19]. Contreras et al [18], however, reported that the (1 1 2) preferred orientation is always obtained for CIS deposited onto amorphous substrates, such as bare soda lime glass (SLG) and Corning 7059 glass, regardless of growth conditions, while the (220/204) preferred orientation is observed for CIS on Mo-coated SLG substrate for certain deposition conditions.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is reported that the preferred orientation of CIS is related to the substrate material, precursor orientation, and process conditions [18,19]. Contreras et al [18], however, reported that the (1 1 2) preferred orientation is always obtained for CIS deposited onto amorphous substrates, such as bare soda lime glass (SLG) and Corning 7059 glass, regardless of growth conditions, while the (220/204) preferred orientation is observed for CIS on Mo-coated SLG substrate for certain deposition conditions.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(103) is closely related to the formation of crystal surface along with (220/204) diffraction peak [20].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…26,28 Contreras et al reported that there is an equivalent symmetry between the {100} plane of γ-In 2 Se 3 (hexagonal) and the {102} plane of CuInSe 2 , and γ-In 2 Se 3 can be a precursor layer of (204)-oriented CuInSe 2 . 29 Although it is premature to conclude that the secondary phase observed is γ-In 2 S 3 , it is conclusive that the secondary phase is an as yet unidentified In-rich compound (either binary or ternary phase) because EDS measurements (figure 3) revealed in the films containing the secondary phase were always slightly In-rich, and an increase in the Cu/In ratio was generally observed when the secondary phase was removed upon annealing ( figures 2(b) and 3). The GAXRD pattern (figure 2(c)) shows that the secondary phase is concentrated at the surface, and several films containing the secondary phase were etched in a 10 percent aqueous KCN solution for 2 min, which is a typical etch recipe to remove a copper sulfide phase segregated to the surface of CuInS 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%