2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0736-0266(03)00040-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

THA loading arising from increased femoral anteversion and offset may lead to critical cement stresses

Abstract: Aseptic loosening of artificial hip joints is believed to be influenced by the design and orientation of the implant. It is hypothesised that variations in implant anteversion and offset lead to changes in the loading of the proximal femur, causing critical conditions to both the bone and cement. The goal of this study was therefore to analyse the role of these parameters on loading, bone strains and cement stresses in total hip arthroplasty (THA). A validated musculo-skeletal model was used for the analysis o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
41
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
41
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…10,11 Computational models of the musculoskeletal system provide access to the internal loads at the tibiofemoral (TF) and PF joints based on external measurements, and can be used to systematically explore the effects of factors relevant to the internal loading conditions. [12][13][14] While early studies estimated PF forces using 2D analyses, 15 recent models can predict 3D muscle and joint contact forces by employing more complex quasistatic or dynamic optimization techniques. [16][17][18] Here, a large variation in PF forces is apparent, especially for activities involving high knee flexion, 1 with PF forces during squatting ranging from 1.9 19 to 3.1 BW 15 at 1008 flexion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,11 Computational models of the musculoskeletal system provide access to the internal loads at the tibiofemoral (TF) and PF joints based on external measurements, and can be used to systematically explore the effects of factors relevant to the internal loading conditions. [12][13][14] While early studies estimated PF forces using 2D analyses, 15 recent models can predict 3D muscle and joint contact forces by employing more complex quasistatic or dynamic optimization techniques. [16][17][18] Here, a large variation in PF forces is apparent, especially for activities involving high knee flexion, 1 with PF forces during squatting ranging from 1.9 19 to 3.1 BW 15 at 1008 flexion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is also a compression-bending force acting on the stem. Increased anteversion, especially in combination with a larger femoral offset, has been shown to raise stresses within the cement mantle [19]. However, this relates only to the bending stresses that mainly load the calcar, but does not take into account the internal rotational torque that is high when loading a hip in flexion [5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Femoral anteversion directly influences patella tracking, which may induce increased pressure at the point of patellofemoral contact, resulting in joint degeneration during repetitive daily activities 32) . The quadriceps, especially the vastus medialis, provide dynamic patellofemoral joint stabilization 33) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%