2011
DOI: 10.1080/01638531003702109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

That Was a Good Story! Preliminary Construction of the Perceived Story Quality Index

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…McAdams (2006b) adds that the kinds of stories that constitute narrative identity must also advance living action, influencing how we live. Our experience as researchers using narrative methods aligns with research which demonstrates that most individuals within a given culture rely on similar implicit theories about story quality (e.g., Baron & Bluck, 2011 empirical ways (to demonstrate convergent, divergent, and incremental validity) when studying topics that have received prior empirical attention.…”
Section: Coding Narrativesmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…McAdams (2006b) adds that the kinds of stories that constitute narrative identity must also advance living action, influencing how we live. Our experience as researchers using narrative methods aligns with research which demonstrates that most individuals within a given culture rely on similar implicit theories about story quality (e.g., Baron & Bluck, 2011 empirical ways (to demonstrate convergent, divergent, and incremental validity) when studying topics that have received prior empirical attention.…”
Section: Coding Narrativesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…1 Operationalizing narrative quality is a complex issue and multiple frameworks have been proposed. Most suggest that a narrative ought to have a coherent episodic structure (e.g., McCabe & Peterson, 1984), include rich detail (e.g., Baron & Bluck, 2009) including emotional detail (e.g., Baron & Bluck, 2011), are engaging to listeners/readers (e.g., Baron & Bluck, 2011), and provide convincing causal explanations for the self (e.g., Narratives are typically obtained alongside responses to questionnaire data. There are no established best practices about the order in which data should be collected.…”
Section: Collecting Narrativesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Narrative is a powerful tool in everyday life (McLean et al 2007) and story-telling is ubiquitous across cultures (US college students; Baron and Bluck 2011;Bruner 1986). The current study assessed Taiwanese women's narrative identity in terms of a self-defining memory at a turning point.…”
Section: Redemptive Versus Contaminative Self-defining Memoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Orben and Dunbar () found passive receivers of highly intimate (compared to low or moderate) fictitious blog posts, felt less close to the blogger. Possibly, autobiographical stories that are engaging and emotional (Baron & Bluck, ), as in this study, cross the threshold of acceptable intimacy between strangers for an initial CMC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Orben and Dunbar (2017) found passive receivers of highly intimate (compared to low or moderate) fictitious blog posts, felt less close to the blogger. Possibly, autobiographical stories that are engaging and emotional (Baron & Bluck, 2011), as in this study, cross the threshold of acceptable intimacy between strangers for an initial CMC. It seems that the receiver's perceptions of the communication and of the sharer (Sprecher et al, 2013), not only the fixed properties of a platform (e.g., in-person, IM), also governs the extent to which social bonds are formed in CMC (Walther, 2011).…”
Section: People Liked and Empathized With A Stranger After Receiving mentioning
confidence: 85%