1999
DOI: 10.1109/16.737459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 1/f noise of InP based 2DEG devices and its dependence on mobility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A closer examination of these data shows that for the suspended structures most of the α values on master curve follow a 1/(μ) 2.6 dependence. Exactly the same dependence α∼1/(μ) 2.6 has been reported for different InP-based two-dimensional electron gas structures with InGaAs channels 80 . We further examined whether the new correlation between α and the matrix element is able to explain the intriguing M-shape of the 1/f noise intensity vs. gate voltage observed both in single- 17,20 and bilayer graphene 21 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…A closer examination of these data shows that for the suspended structures most of the α values on master curve follow a 1/(μ) 2.6 dependence. Exactly the same dependence α∼1/(μ) 2.6 has been reported for different InP-based two-dimensional electron gas structures with InGaAs channels 80 . We further examined whether the new correlation between α and the matrix element is able to explain the intriguing M-shape of the 1/f noise intensity vs. gate voltage observed both in single- 17,20 and bilayer graphene 21 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The averaged transfer curves for films ranging in thickness from 40nm to 7nm and a set of 10nm devices with a deposition rate of 3.6 Å/s are shown in Figure 2a. As has been reported previously 16 , an optimum mobility is obtained for intermediate thicknesses of [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] nm.…”
supporting
confidence: 55%
“…It can be seen in Figure 3 An increase in noise levels in inverse proportion to mobility is expected in the case of semiconductor transport limited by impurity scattering 2 , and strong correlations of noise with mobility are often observed in devices withlimited mobility 3,17,22 . Increased noise in thin films has also been attributed to current crowding in inhomogeneous films 20, 23, .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The examples are 1/f noise in vacuum tube [5], and in carbon composition [6]. The examples in low-dimensional condensed matter systems are the flicker noise in InP based 2DEG (InAlAs/InGaAs/InP heterostructure) [7], in SiON and MGHK MOSFETs [8], in AlGaAs/GaAs heterostructures [9,10], low-frequency 1/f noise in graphene [11], and in the 2DEG in a Si-MOSFET in the vicinity of MIT [12], for good reviews see [13,14]. There are many theoretical studies on the origin of the flicker noise in low-dimensional systems, like its possible relation with the percolation theory [15] and the MC Whorter's two-level model [16], and Hooge's model [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%