The 10-Item Positive and Negative Affect Schedule for Children, Child and Parent Shortened Versions: Application of Item Response Theory for More Efficient Assessment

Ebesutani, Chad; Regan, Jennifer; Smith, Ashley M.; Reise, Steven P.; Higa-McMillan, Charmaine K.; Chorpita, Bruce F.

doi:10.1007/s10862-011-9273-2

Cited by 334 publications

(280 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

262

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Adolescents rated statements [e.g., ''In most ways my life is close to the way I would want it to be''; x = .89, 95% CI (.87, .91)] on a 5-point scale from disagree a lot to agree a lot. Evidence of convergent and discriminant validity has been observed for these three components of subjective wellbeing (Ebesutani et al 2012;Gadermann et al 2010). …”

Section: Subjective Wellbeingmentioning

confidence: 96%

“…To measure positive and negative affect, we used the 10-item shortened Positive and Negative Affect Schedule for Children (Ebesutani et al 2012). Adolescents rated the extent to which they generally felt positive affect [e.g., joyful, happy; x = .90, 95% CI (.88, .92)] and negative affect [e.g., miserable, afraid; x = .82, 95% CI (.76, .85)] on a 5-point scale ranging from very slightly or not at all to extremely.…”

Section: Subjective Wellbeingmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Strengths and Subjective Wellbeing in Adolescence: Strength-Based Parenting and the Moderating Effect of Mindset

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recent research suggests that strength-based parenting-the tendency for parents to see and encourage children to use their strengths-relates to lower stress and higher life satisfaction in adolescents. The current study tests whether strength-based parenting, in conjunction with a teenager's strengths use, influences the teenager's subjective wellbeing, and whether a growth mindset moderates the relationship between strength-based parenting and strengths use. Three hundred and sixty three adolescents (M age = 13.74, 51% female) completed questionnaire measures of strength-based parenting, strengths use, subjective wellbeing (life satisfaction, positive affect, and negative affect), Extraversion, Neuroticism, and two aspects of growth mindset. A hierarchical regression using latent variables found that strengths use and strength-based parenting were both significant independent predictors of subjective wellbeing, over and above the effects of extraversion and neuroticism. A mediation analysis found that strengths use partially mediated the relationship between strength-based parenting and subjective wellbeing. Finally, a novel measure of strengths mindset significantly moderated the relationship between strength-based parenting and strengths use. These results suggest that adolescents who see their parents as strength-based report greater strengths use (especially when they have a growth mindset about their strengths) and greater subjective wellbeing.

show abstract

Section: Subjective Wellbeingmentioning

confidence: 96%

Section: Subjective Wellbeingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Strengths and Subjective Wellbeing in Adolescence: Strength-Based Parenting and the Moderating Effect of Mindset

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…All variables were measured using indices that have been validated in the literature. Positive and negative affect (α = .87, .82, respectively) were measured using the short form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS-SF; Ebesutani et al, 2012); life satisfaction was measured using the Diener's Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS; α = .87; Diener, Emmons, Larsen, & Griffin, 1985); positive mental health was measured using the Mental Health Continuum Short Form (MHC-SF; α = .92; Keyes, 2009); social alienation was measured using the Social Alienation Scale created by Jessor and Jessor (1977;α = .83), where four positive-oriented or non-alienation items were reversecoded; and finally, self-esteem was measured using the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSE; α = .89; Martin-Albo, Núñez, Navarro, & Grijalvo, 2007), where five items were reverse-coded before computation.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Correlates of Binge Drinking in a Sample of Canadian University Students

Edkins

Edgerton

Roberts

2017

IJCYFS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:There is a lack of recent research exploring the differences between binge and non-binge drinkers among Canadian university students. The current study aims to address this gap in the literature through an exploratory statistical analysis. Univariate, bivariate, and multivariate (logistic regression) analyses were employed to identify the prevalence of binge drinking, as well as its various sociodemographic, behavioural, and mental health correlates. A large majority (83.1%) of the 507 respondents reported consuming alcohol in the previous 12 months; of these, 69.7% (67.0% of males, 70.9% of females) reported engaging in binge drinking (5 drinks in one session for males, 4 for females) at least once in the previous 30 days. Although there was no significant gender difference in the prevalence of binge drinking, there were several gender differences among the correlates. Compared to non-binge drinkers, male binge drinkers reported greater life satisfaction, and greater probability of smoking cigarettes and engaging in risky sex, while females reported greater impulsivity and lower religiosity. As expected, binge drinkers experienced more adverse consequences from alcohol consumption than did non-binge drinkers, but unexpectedly did not differ significantly in mental health and wellbeing. Limitations of the present study and future research directions are discussed with a view to improving our understanding of risk and protective factors related to unhealthy alcohol consumption among university students in Canada and abroad.Keywords binge drinking; alcohol research; university students; Canada; mental health Tamara Edkins MA is a student in the Faculty of Law at the University of Manitoba, 224 Dysart Rd., Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2.

show abstract

“…The 10-Item Positive and Negative Affect Schedule for Children (10-item PANAS-C) El 10-item PANAS-C (Ebesutani et al, 2012) evalúa el afecto positivo y negativo a partir de los 6 años de edad. La escala cuenta con una versión para niños y otra para padres, no obstante, en nuestro estudio únicamente se empleó la versión de autorreporte para niños.…”

Section: Instrumentosunclassified

Perfeccionismo Socialmente Prescrito y afecto en la infancia

Vicent¹,

Inglés²,

Gonzálvez³

et al. 2016

Revista INFAD de Psicología

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

RESUMENEl objetivo de este estudio consistió en analizar la capacidad predictiva del afecto sobre las altas puntuaciones en Perfeccionismo Socialmente Prescrito (PSP) durante la infancia. Se reclutó una muestra de 462 alumnos españoles de Educación Primaria entre 8 y 11 años, de los cuales un 50.08% era varones. Se empleó la Child and Adolescent Perfectionism Scale (CAPS) y la 10-Item Positive and Negative Affect Schedule for Children (10-item PANAS-C) para evaluar, respectivamente, la dimensión PSP y el afecto positivo y negativo. Los resultados del análisis de regresión logís-tica revelaron que tanto el Afecto Positivo como el Afecto Negativo predijeron significativamente altos niveles de PSP, con valores de OR de 1.03 y 1.10. Los resultados apoyaron parcialmente las hipótesis formuladas, indicando que durante la infancia, al contrario que durante la adultez, el PSP se asocia significativamente y de forma positiva con ambos tipos de afecto. No obstante, se evidenció que esta asociación era mucho más estrecha en el caso del Afecto Negativo.Palabras clave: perfeccionismo socialmente prescrito, afecto positivo, afecto negativo, infancia ABSTRACT Socially prescribed perfectionism and affect during childhood The aim of this study was to analyze the predictive capacity of affect on high scores on Socially Prescribed Perfectionism (SPP) during childhood. A sample of 462 Spanish Primary school students between 8 and 11 years old, 50.08% of whom were males, was used. The Child and Adolescent Perfectionism Scale (CAPS) and the 10-item Positive and Negative Affect Schedule for Children (10-item PANAS-C) to evaluate, respectively, the SPP and the positive and negative affect, were utilized. The logistic regression analysis results revealed that both Positive and Negative Affect

show abstract

The 10-Item Positive and Negative Affect Schedule for Children, Child and Parent Shortened Versions: Application of Item Response Theory for More Efficient Assessment

Cited by 334 publications

References 29 publications

Strengths and Subjective Wellbeing in Adolescence: Strength-Based Parenting and the Moderating Effect of Mindset

Strengths and Subjective Wellbeing in Adolescence: Strength-Based Parenting and the Moderating Effect of Mindset

Correlates of Binge Drinking in a Sample of Canadian University Students

Perfeccionismo Socialmente Prescrito y afecto en la infancia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About