2011
DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-9-12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 12-item medical outcomes study short form health survey version 2.0 (SF-12v2): a population-based validation study from Tehran, Iran

Abstract: BackgroundThe SF-12v2 is the improved version of the SF-12v1. This study aimed to validate the SF-12v2 in Iran.MethodsA random sample of the general population aged 18 years and over living in Tehran, Iran completed the instrument. Reliability was estimated using internal consistency and validity was assessed using known-groups comparison and convergent validity. In addition the factor structure of the questionnaire was extracted by performing both exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFA and CFA).Res… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

11
111
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
11
111
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The mental and physical health subscales were positively and moderately associated. This result corroborates previous findings suggesting the interconnection between physical and mental health, and more precisely, between the PCS and MHS factors of the SF scales (Hobart, Williams, Moran, & Thompson, 2002;Montazeri et al, 2011;Simon, Revicki, Grothaus, & Vonkorff, 1998). Both PCS and MCS subscales also presented adequate convergent validity with the external measures (SHS, SWLS, GHQ-12, and ASAS-R).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mental and physical health subscales were positively and moderately associated. This result corroborates previous findings suggesting the interconnection between physical and mental health, and more precisely, between the PCS and MHS factors of the SF scales (Hobart, Williams, Moran, & Thompson, 2002;Montazeri et al, 2011;Simon, Revicki, Grothaus, & Vonkorff, 1998). Both PCS and MCS subscales also presented adequate convergent validity with the external measures (SHS, SWLS, GHQ-12, and ASAS-R).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Alpha reliabilities were also adequate and similar to previous studies (Cheak-Zamora, Wyrwich, & McBride, 2009;De Smedt et al, 2013;Montazeri et al, 2011). Although the factor loadings and alpha reliability were adequate, a confirmatory factor analysis evaluation of the SF-12v2 provided non-acceptable fit indices.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…health summary score ranged 4-73. These factors were based on the median (Me), divided into 2 groups of high and low HRQoL [18]. In addition to the mentioned measures, socio-demographic characteristics were also measured and addressed as potential confounders in the multivariate analysis.…”
Section: Measurement and Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GFI, NFI, and CFI values ranged from 0 to 1 and a value of [0.90 represented a satisfactory model fit [26]. A RMSEA of \0.05 was suggested as an indicator of close fit [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Convergent and discriminant validity were tested using the correlation between item and subscale or summary (PCS or MCS) scores with Spearman's correlation coefficient (q) [27,28]. The correlation coefficients between item and subscale or summary score C0.4 were satisfied for convergent validity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%