2008
DOI: 10.1785/gssrl.79.5.707
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 1494 and 1680 Malaga (Southern Spain) Earthquakes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4, one is located in B1 region, two in B2 and four in B3. So, for the churches' type, the consistency between expected and observed damage has proved to be independent on the subzone in Goded et al (2008) which the building is located (and thus with the site effects). These results together with the fact that churches correspond to one of the types better characterized in the VI technique (Sect.…”
Section: Málaga's Monuments Vulnerabilitymentioning
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…4, one is located in B1 region, two in B2 and four in B3. So, for the churches' type, the consistency between expected and observed damage has proved to be independent on the subzone in Goded et al (2008) which the building is located (and thus with the site effects). These results together with the fact that churches correspond to one of the types better characterized in the VI technique (Sect.…”
Section: Málaga's Monuments Vulnerabilitymentioning
confidence: 88%
“…For the first part of the vulnerability study, the VI method has been used to analyze the 19 monuments damaged in Málaga city due to the 1680 event and still existing today, from a total of 36 buildings with damage information in historical documents (Goded et al 2008). Ten of these buildings have been assigned a damage grade 4 (EMS-98 scale), seven a grade correspond to the Muslim Alcazaba and Gibralfaro castles.…”
Section: Málaga's Monuments Vulnerabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations