2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00024-021-02734-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 16 September 2015 Illapel Earthquake and Tsunami: Post-Event Tsunami Inundation, Building and Infrastructure Damage Survey in Coquimbo, Chile

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the situation is more complex for the Coquimbo-La Serena region. While the CoB NNM predicts inundation at a level large enough to have prompted evacuation (hazard properly categorized), none of the network models is capable to predict the measured flow depth of nearly 6 m 60 , 62 , 90 . Notably, the Hayes model 75 for the Illapel event forecasts very small flow depths (a missed alarm).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the situation is more complex for the Coquimbo-La Serena region. While the CoB NNM predicts inundation at a level large enough to have prompted evacuation (hazard properly categorized), none of the network models is capable to predict the measured flow depth of nearly 6 m 60 , 62 , 90 . Notably, the Hayes model 75 for the Illapel event forecasts very small flow depths (a missed alarm).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other location is Coquimbo bay (29 57’12”S 71 20’17”W), which shows a different behavior, as it was inundated during the 2015 Illapel earthquake 60 , while large amplitudes were recorded in the local tide gauge during the 2010 Maule tsunami 58 and recently during the Hunga-Tonga-Hunga-Ha’apai transpacific tsunami 61 , but without inundation. In addition, the bay is highly resonant, and with a spatial structure of the first mode that induces the southern end of the bay to be susceptible to tsunami inundation, whereas the central and northern ends are less prone to become inundated 62 . Hence, this location allows for assessing the capabilities of the network for complex inundation behavior and inundation footprints.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum flow depth obtained by the models for the reference Manning value in a fraction of the Coquimbo area is shown in Figure 6 together with the results in a transect close to that used in Aránguiz et al [36]. The impact of the tsunami in Coquimbo bay was examined in field surveys (for example, see [36,42]). From these investigations, the measurements obtained are valuable as reference values for comparisons to numerical simulations.…”
Section: Illapel Event 2015 321 Offshore Assessment Based On Experime...mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Tsunami fragility curves commonly rely on relatively large samples of empirical or modelled impact damage data, yet such quantitative empirical data for infrastructure vulnerability are rare and have only recently been a focus of post-event impact assessment (MLIT, 2012; Paulik et al, 2019Paulik et al, , 2021 and physical modelling studies (C Chen and Melville, 2015; Cheng Chen et al, 2017Chen et al, , 2018Rossetto et al, 2014). For infrastructure networks, transportation components, namely roads, bridges, utility poles and port structures, have been previously analysed for fragility function development from empirical eld surveys and physical modelling (Chua et al, 2020;Eguchi et al, 2013; Kawashima and Buckle, 2013; Koks et al, 2019;Maruyama and Itagaki, 2017;Shoji and Moriyama, 2007;Williams, et al, 2020b;Williams, et al, 2020a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%