2004
DOI: 10.1080/1350485042000254584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 2004 Olympic Games announcement and its effect on the Athens and Milan stock exchanges

Abstract: Through an event study methodology, the effect of the nomination of Athens as the hosting city for the Olympics of 2004 on the stock exchanges of Greece (winner) and Italy (loser), the two primary candidates for the Games is examined. Academic literature suggests that sporting mega events have a positive contribution to the host area economy. This implies that the stock exchange should react positively to the announcement of such events. Berman et al. (2000), in a similar study on the announcement of the Sydne… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
41
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The increased exposure to international media may also produce long-term benefits through increased tourism receipts in the years after the event. Veraros et al (2004) examine the effect of the announcement of the hosting city for the 2004 Olympic games on the stock exchanges of Greece and Italy and find a significant positive effect on the Athens Stock Exchange.…”
Section: Mega-eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The increased exposure to international media may also produce long-term benefits through increased tourism receipts in the years after the event. Veraros et al (2004) examine the effect of the announcement of the hosting city for the 2004 Olympic games on the stock exchanges of Greece and Italy and find a significant positive effect on the Athens Stock Exchange.…”
Section: Mega-eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further we also take into account the country bidding record. The motivation for including this piece of information is grounded on the idea that the selection outcome is influenced by the lobbying power of the candidacies (Veraros et al 2004): if the country did bid for hosting the last event and lost, investors may perceive that the lobbying power is limited and anticipate that, once again the candidacy will not succeed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, hosting such events, or success in them, appears to influence optimism in stock markets [2,17,28,30,42] and subjective well-being [29,40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As suggested by Berman et al (2000) and Veraros et al (2004), abnormal returns may exhibit cross-sectional dependence. When such dependence is suspected, Peterson (1989) advocated the standardization of the abnormal returns.…”
Section: Event Study Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%