2006
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20054588
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 2005 Draconid outburst

Abstract: Aims. We report the flux profile and mean orbit for meteoroids associated with an unexpected activity outburst from the Draconid meteor shower on 8 October, 2005. The primary aim is to define the characteristics of the outburst and establish the age of the associated meteoroids. Methods. Radar data from the outburst are used to define the flux profile and mass distribution for Draconid meteoroids at small meteoroid masses, while visual data are used to define the ZHR profile at larger masses. The radar recorde… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
31
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
31
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The determination of the mass distribution index suffered from low number statistics, nevertheless, it seems that the index was similar to that in 1998 and somewhat lower than that in 1985. The radiants of several Draconids recorded simultaneously from two stations lie close to the theoretical value of Campbell-Brown et al (2006) and also to the radiants reported in other papers describing earlier Draconid outbursts. We did not observe meteors from the radiant detected by the radar, which was shifted by about 4 degrees to the West.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The determination of the mass distribution index suffered from low number statistics, nevertheless, it seems that the index was similar to that in 1998 and somewhat lower than that in 1985. The radiants of several Draconids recorded simultaneously from two stations lie close to the theoretical value of Campbell-Brown et al (2006) and also to the radiants reported in other papers describing earlier Draconid outbursts. We did not observe meteors from the radiant detected by the radar, which was shifted by about 4 degrees to the West.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…For the rest of the night the numbers of meteors did not exceed the annual Draconid level. This result is in good agreement with the observations of Campbell-Brown et al (2006). According to their paper the maximum activity occurred at 16.1 UT.…”
Section: Recorded Datasupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We employed double-station observations with image intensified video cameras on three nights from October 6 to October 9, 2005. A higher than expected activity of the Draconid shower occurred in the evening hours on October 8 (Campbell-Brown et al 2006, and Paper I); we observed the end of this activity between the evening twilight and about 19 UT. Unfortunately, because of poor weather at the second station (Třebíč), most meteors observed during this period were detected only in Ondřejov.…”
Section: The Observationssupporting
confidence: 49%