2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-28551-6_51
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 2011 Signal Separation Evaluation Campaign (SiSEC2011): - Audio Source Separation -

Abstract: Abstract. This paper summarizes the audio part of the 2011 communitybased Signal Separation Evaluation Campaign (SiSEC2011). Four speech and music datasets were contributed, including datasets recorded in noisy or dynamic environments and a subset of the SiSEC2010 datasets. The participants addressed one or more tasks out of four source separation tasks, and the results for each task were evaluated using different objective performance criteria. We provide an overview of the audio datasets, tasks and criteria.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
67
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(14 reference statements)
1
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The impulse responses were measured by using a maximum length sequence generated by a 17-th order polynomial over GF (2). We made four sets of mixtures using the music sources listed in Table I, which can be found at the professionally produced music recordings page of the Signal Separation Evaluation Campaign (SiSEC 2011) [24]. The mixtures were down-sampled to 16 kHz.…”
Section: A Experimental Setupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impulse responses were measured by using a maximum length sequence generated by a 17-th order polynomial over GF (2). We made four sets of mixtures using the music sources listed in Table I, which can be found at the professionally produced music recordings page of the Signal Separation Evaluation Campaign (SiSEC 2011) [24]. The mixtures were down-sampled to 16 kHz.…”
Section: A Experimental Setupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These dry sources were obtained from professionally produced music and underdetermined separation tasks in SiSEC2011 [29]. To simulate the reverberant mixture, the observed signals were produced by convoluting the impulse response E2A (T 60 = 300 ms) or JR2 (T 60 = 470 ms), which was obtained from the RWCP [30], with each source.…”
Section: B Dataset and Experimental Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed algorithm was evaluated in terms of mono audio source separation using six mixtures, from the "underdetermined speech and music mixtures task"of the Signal Separation Evaluation Campaign 2011 (SiSEC 2011) [18], which is also included in SiSEC 2016, with downmixing to a mono signal. Each mixture was composed of three sources in 16-bit format with a sampling frequency of 16000 Hz.…”
Section: Unsupervised Audio Source Separation Testmentioning
confidence: 99%