2011
DOI: 10.1785/0120100154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 3 August 2009 Mw 6.9 Canal de Ballenas Region, Gulf of California, Earthquake and Its Aftershocks

Abstract: On 3 August 2009 an earthquake of magnitude M w 6.9 occurred near Canal de Ballenas, in the north-central region of the Gulf of California, Mexico. The focal mechanism of the main event, reported in the Global Centroid Moment Tensor (CMT) catalog, is right lateral strike-slip with a strike of 216°and a dip of 78°. The initial location reported by the National Seismological Service of Mexico [Servicio Sismólogico Nacional (SSN)] and the Array Network Facility (ANF) suggested that the epicenter was on the North … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Initially we solve for uniform slip but later derive spatially variable slip for our preferred model geometry. The dislocation model uses eight parameters, with inversion boundaries (Table 4) approximating the central moment tensor solution of the main shock, precise epicentral locations and the subsequent estimated rupture area [Castro et al, 2011], the mapped fault geometry [Lonsdale, 1989], and the azimuth of Baja California-North America geodetic plate motion [Plattner et al, 2007]. Simultaneously with the deformation source, we solve for phase ramps for each averaged interferogram representing longwavelength tropospheric delay variations [Fattahi and Amelung, 2014].…”
Section: Coseismic Displacement Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Initially we solve for uniform slip but later derive spatially variable slip for our preferred model geometry. The dislocation model uses eight parameters, with inversion boundaries (Table 4) approximating the central moment tensor solution of the main shock, precise epicentral locations and the subsequent estimated rupture area [Castro et al, 2011], the mapped fault geometry [Lonsdale, 1989], and the azimuth of Baja California-North America geodetic plate motion [Plattner et al, 2007]. Simultaneously with the deformation source, we solve for phase ramps for each averaged interferogram representing longwavelength tropospheric delay variations [Fattahi and Amelung, 2014].…”
Section: Coseismic Displacement Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most parameters are tightly constrained; only rupture depth and slip show larger [Castro et al, 2011].…”
Section: Coseismic Displacement Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations