2019
DOI: 10.5194/isprs-archives-xlii-2-w15-255-2019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 3d Survey of the Roman Bridge of San Lorenzo in Padova (Italy): A Comparison Between SFM and TLS Methodologies Applied to the Arch Structure

Abstract: <p><strong>Abstract.</strong> 3D survey methodologies are widely applied to the Cultural Heritage, employing both TLS and close-range photogrammetry with SfM techniques. Laser scanning produces models with high metric reliability and accuracy, whereas the main quality of the 3D photogrammetry is the result in term of photorealistic representation. Many studies have been conducted about the comparison and the integration of these different approaches and the aim of this paper is to contribute … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the comparisons between models acquired at different times, to reduce the influence of the georeferencing The first and the last scans were compared to detect displacements of cracks affecting the structures (Figure 11). The M3C2 plugin tool of the software Cloud Compare allowed to perform the computation of distances between two point clouds, considering some input parameters about the density of core points and volume in which the homolog points for the distance calculation are identified [45]. The results, highlighted by the color scale, show that the fractures seem to remain stable or the deformation is too small to be observed with the TLS approach.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the comparisons between models acquired at different times, to reduce the influence of the georeferencing The first and the last scans were compared to detect displacements of cracks affecting the structures (Figure 11). The M3C2 plugin tool of the software Cloud Compare allowed to perform the computation of distances between two point clouds, considering some input parameters about the density of core points and volume in which the homolog points for the distance calculation are identified [45]. The results, highlighted by the color scale, show that the fractures seem to remain stable or the deformation is too small to be observed with the TLS approach.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…danielgm.net/cc/). This is a specific tool that allows to calculate the distance between two 3D entities (cloud-to-cloud, cloud-to-mesh and mesh-to-mesh) [45,46]. To this end, a subset of points (core points) of one of the two point clouds (reference cloud) is considered.…”
Section: Terrestrial Laser Scanning (Tls) and Structure From Motion (Sfm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A matching distance map (bottom right‐hand image) is a visual representation of the distances between two objects measured in 3D. It can be performed between point clouds, meshes or both on 3D software such as CloudCompare M3C2 plugin (James et al, 2017) or 3DReshaper inspect tool (Carraro et al, 2019). Such matching distance maps can be compared with RMSE measures that help check the quality of fit between surfaces.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the choice of a "light" approach seemed to be an adequate solution in an optic of non-invasive presence in a particular protected site and considering the relation between time of surveying and obtained results (Carraro et al, 2019). An aerial photogrammetric survey with a lightweight drone (Fig.…”
Section: Geomatic Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%