2016
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01392
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 4-Dimensional Plant: Effects of Wind-Induced Canopy Movement on Light Fluctuations and Photosynthesis

Abstract: Physical perturbation of a plant canopy brought about by wind is a ubiquitous phenomenon and yet its biological importance has often been overlooked. This is partly due to the complexity of the issue at hand: wind-induced movement (or mechanical excitation) is a stochastic process which is difficult to measure and quantify; plant motion is dependent upon canopy architectural features which, until recently, were difficult to accurately represent and model in 3-dimensions; light patterning throughout a canopy is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
76
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under water deficit conditions, wind increased the rate of water loss from the system, leading to higher midday leaf temperatures, a more rapid drop in the efficiency of the photosynthetic apparatus, and accelerated rates of wilting and mortality in the three species tested. These main effects of wind were in line with findings in other studies showing that wind may accelerate desiccation of green roof systems and, directly or indirectly, affect plant performance [15, 16, 17, 18, 19].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Under water deficit conditions, wind increased the rate of water loss from the system, leading to higher midday leaf temperatures, a more rapid drop in the efficiency of the photosynthetic apparatus, and accelerated rates of wilting and mortality in the three species tested. These main effects of wind were in line with findings in other studies showing that wind may accelerate desiccation of green roof systems and, directly or indirectly, affect plant performance [15, 16, 17, 18, 19].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The moderate wind in our study (3.7 m s −1 ) was not sufficient to have an impact on the morphological and physiological parameters of watered control plants [21]. The effect of wind on plants depends on many factors, including its velocity and duration, but also on local environmental conditions, and can vary from positive to no or adverse impacts [15]. Therefore, it is possible that, under conditions different from those tested in this study; the response of well-watered plants to wind may be slightly different.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent advances in ray-tracing algorithms facilitated by improved imaging and computational abilities have enabled models with greater ability to account for the actual structure of a crop canopy and more precise localization of light regimes (Song et al, 2013;Burgess et al, 2015). These models have been leveraged to produce a representation of the impact of wind speed, variability, and direction on intercanopy radiation regimes and the net assimilation of a wheat canopy (Burgess et al, 2016). This work reveals that an increase in light penetration into the canopy due to wind-driven canopy movement can increase total canopy carbon gain by up to 17% and raises interesting possibilities for the improvement of canopy photosynthesis through canopy structural modifications.…”
Section: Seeing the Sun Through The Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research is being conducted to understand response characteristics of useful plants by obtaining data on global change in plant physiology [9]. Based on omics data represented by proteomic profiles, attempts for mathematical modeling of plant response mechanisms against stimulation were underway with a focus on the prediction of plant response under field conditions [10,11,12]. However, studies for crops have lagged behind those of the model species because of genetic diversity of important crops and resulting scarcity of genomic information or knowledge on response mechanisms in each species [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%