Each year, more districts implement early warning systems (EWS). These EWS predict negative student outcomes, such as dropping out, before they occur. Predictions are then used to match at-risk students to appropriate supports and interventions. Research suggests that these systems are useful in ensuring educators respond to student needs early, generating conversation around specific students at risk of dropping out. However, no research considers what new information teachers gain from having a specific prediction for a student. This article bridges this gap by comparing teacher and EWS predictions of whether students will complete high school and enroll in college. Further, it assesses whether accuracy in teacher judgment stems from additional information not in modelsespecially related to academic tenacity-and biases like self-fulfilling prophecies. Generally, EWS can provide benefits both as organizational tools and by increasing the precision with which students are identified for supports and interventions.Each year, more school districts implement early warning systems (EWS). These systems use data-early warning indicators (EWI)-to predict student outcomes (such as dropping out or failing to attend college) before they occur, and then to develop coherent supports and interventions around those forecasts. The most common use of these predictions is to help districts identify and support students at risk of dropping out or experiencing some other roadblock (Allensworth, 2013;Davis, Herzog, & Legters, 2013;Kemple, Segeritz, & Stephenson, 2013). In particular, research suggests that EWS help generate meaningful conversations around these atrisk students and, more broadly, organize coherent responses to their needs at an earlier stage in their schooling (Allensworth, 2013;Davis et al., 2013).Although research clearly demonstrates that EWS add value by generating conversations about students earlier than they might otherwise occur, few studies consider how, exactly, the data from EWS are useful once these conversations begin. What new information do teachers gain by having an EWS prediction, given what they already know about students from classroom observation and assessment? One could imagine EWS forecasts help teachers because the predictions add precision, perhaps helping identify students as at risk who, otherwise, appear Correspondence should be addressed to