The Access/Impact Problem and the Green and Gold Roads to Open Access

Harnad, Stevan; Brody, Tim; Vallières, François; Carr, Les; Hitchcock, Steve; Gingras, Yves; Oppenheim, Charles; Stamerjohanns, Heinrich; Hilf, Eberhard R.

doi:10.1016/j.serrev.2004.09.013

Cited by 256 publications

(194 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

166

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…However, now, like computer scientists and physicists who have been self-archiving articles for many years, 15 all physicians, including dermatologists, should consider self-archiving their articles more routinely and promoting journals with permissive self-archiving policies (Table III). 16 …”

Section: Sherpa/romeomentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Self-archiving dermatology articles

Dellavalle

Banks

Ellis

2008

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Sherpa/romeomentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[10][11][12] This policy allows JAAD authors to post (1) preprints prior to submission and (2) articles 16 …”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Self-archiving dermatology articles

Dellavalle

Banks

Ellis

2008

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…According to Harnad et al [13] about 24,000 peerreviewed research journals exist worldwide. This means that there are enough publishing opportunities in almost every field of science.…”

Section: Selecting a Journalmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Journals with high IF are considered of high significance and often researchers are evaluated based on the IFs of the journals they have published in ref. [13]. Nonetheless, the IF is merely arithmetic, and IF should not be used as a parameter to evaluate the level and quality of scientific work performed by a researcher [17].…”

Section: Selecting a Journalmentioning

confidence: 99%

Scientific writing: Strategies and tools for students and advisors

Singh

Mayer²

2014

Biochem Molecular Bio Educ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Scientific writing is a demanding task and many students need more time than expected to finish their research articles. To speed up the process, we highlight some tools, strategies as well as writing guides. We recommend starting early in the research process with writing and to prepare research articles, not after but in parallel to the lab or field work. We suggest considering scientific writing as a team enterprise, which needs proper organization and regular feedback. In addition, it is helpful to select potential target journals early and to consider not only scope and reputation, but also decision times and rejection rates. Before submission, instructions to authors and writing guides should be considered, and drafts should be extensively revised. Later in the process editor's and reviewer's comments should be followed. Our tips and tools help students and advisors to structure the writing and publishing process, thereby stimulating them to develop their own strategies to success. V C 2014 by The International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 42(5): 405-413, 2014.

show abstract

“…The solution is known, and it is (belatedly) beginning to be implemented: authors can make their peer-reviewed research accessible free for all online by self-archiving their peer-reviewed final drafts in their institutional repository immediately upon acceptance for publication, and their institutions and funders can mandate such self-archiving (Harnad et al 2003). The author's selfarchived final draft is not the publisher's version of record -it is peer-reviewed, but it is not copyedited nor in the publisher's final format.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%