2017
DOI: 10.1002/bes2.1336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Accuracy of Citizen Science Data: A Quantitative Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
160
0
8

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 240 publications
(172 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
4
160
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies of other organisms have found that research using data from citizen scientists produced results that were comparable F I G U R E 2 Land cover with small ape observations reported in social media or submitted directly by citizen scientists. Most sightings were inside forested areas near to roads for all three species of small apes with researcher-generated data (Aceves-Bueno et al, 2017;Horns et al, 2018aHorns et al, , 2018bSchuttler et al, 2019 Our results indicate that visitors to Malaysian forests notice small apes and that at least some of them value these encounters enough to post them on social media when they occur. Encouragingly, we found reliable reports of small ape sightings by citizen scientists in almost all states in Peninsular Malaysia, and the reports spanned most of the reported geographic distribution for each small ape taxon.…”
Section: Comparison and Critiquementioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies of other organisms have found that research using data from citizen scientists produced results that were comparable F I G U R E 2 Land cover with small ape observations reported in social media or submitted directly by citizen scientists. Most sightings were inside forested areas near to roads for all three species of small apes with researcher-generated data (Aceves-Bueno et al, 2017;Horns et al, 2018aHorns et al, , 2018bSchuttler et al, 2019 Our results indicate that visitors to Malaysian forests notice small apes and that at least some of them value these encounters enough to post them on social media when they occur. Encouragingly, we found reliable reports of small ape sightings by citizen scientists in almost all states in Peninsular Malaysia, and the reports spanned most of the reported geographic distribution for each small ape taxon.…”
Section: Comparison and Critiquementioning
confidence: 62%
“…Previous studies of other organisms have found that research using data from citizen scientists produced results that were comparable with researcher‐generated data (Aceves‐Bueno et al, 2017; Horns et al, 2018a, 2018b; Schuttler et al, 2019). Small apes typically travel in the middle or upper forest canopy, and most small apes in Malaysia have a dark pelage, making them quite difficult to photograph.…”
Section: Comparison and Critiquementioning
confidence: 73%
“…While few would argue about the educational and public outreach benefits of citizen science projects, the usefulness of the data they generate is less certain. Systematic analysis of ecological citizen science projects shows that in many cases, volunteers produce data that are so flawed as to be analytically useless (e.g., Aceves-Bueno et al 2017;Mac-Donald 2018).…”
Section: Crowd-sourced Discoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The staff gauge approach was developed as an intuitive approach to collect water level data, so that many citizen scientists would be able to contribute. Such a simple approach is often recommended to citizen science project initiators (Aceves-Bueno et al, 2017). Many other citizen science projects, such as CrowdHydrology and iNaturalist, also chose a data collection method that is deliberately kept easy so that citizen scientists do not require training in advance (Gaddis, 2018;Lowry et al, 2019).…”
Section: Does the Crowdwater Game Help Participants To Place A Staff mentioning
confidence: 99%