2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The accuracy of endometrial sampling in women with postmenopausal bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

6
104
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
6
104
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are in line with results of a recent meta‐analysis that demonstrated that endometrial sampling is very accurate in diagnosing endometrial cancer, but less accurate in ruling out endometrial cancer 20. A large randomized controlled trial and two retrospective studies have shown that hysteroscopy contributed to the detection of focal (pre)malignancies in women with postmenopausal bleeding and thickened endometrium with benign histology 21, 22, 23.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These findings are in line with results of a recent meta‐analysis that demonstrated that endometrial sampling is very accurate in diagnosing endometrial cancer, but less accurate in ruling out endometrial cancer 20. A large randomized controlled trial and two retrospective studies have shown that hysteroscopy contributed to the detection of focal (pre)malignancies in women with postmenopausal bleeding and thickened endometrium with benign histology 21, 22, 23.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Although recent studies suggest that further diagnostic work‐up in case of benign histology is recommended to exclude focal endometrial (pre)malignancy 20, 21, 22, 23, all women in our study that developed endometrial cancer after initial benign histology or hyperplasia without atypia, presented with recurrent postmenopausal bleeding, and were diagnosed with early stage disease. Therefore, based on these data, we cannot yet recommend the need for additional work‐up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…According to the results of recent metaanalysis performed by van Hanegem et al [4], the sensitivity of endometrial sampling in women with postmenopausal bleeding to detect not only endometrial cancer but also atypical hyperplasia or benign endometrial conditions like intrauterine polyps, is lower than previously thought. Endometrial biopsy performed for abnormal uterine bleeding evaluation using Pipelle device has the sensitivity of malignancy detection ranging from 67% to 83.5% [4]. Although endometrial cancer in young women is very rare it can be unexpectedly detected at hysteroscopy during uterine cavity diagnosis due to multiple IVF failures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Appropriate EC staging before operative procedures is mandatory to plan effective and tailored surgical treatment. In case of abnormal uterine bleeding, curettage was regarded to be the gold diagnostic standard for many decades [4]. The aim of our study was to analyze the available current status of knowledge regarding the possibility of neoplastic cell spread in the peritoneal cavity in the course of hysteroscopy performed in women with endometrial cancer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Correct identification and classification of hyperplasia are especially important in endometrial biopsy and curettage specimens because proper diagnosis guides clinical therapy³, which can be very different depending on the type of hyperplasia found. This pathologic entity is detected in up to 25% of women with abnormal bleeding that were submitted to diagnostic hysteroscopy [4][5][6] . The atypical hyperplasias presents a higher risk for adenocarcinoma progression and, in 40% of cases, it can occur with concomitant invasive neoplasia 7 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%