2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-008-0568-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The accuracy of post-void residual measurement in women

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This accuracy compares favourably with the ± 20-25% for the most accurate ultrasonic techniques for PVR measurement with the potential error using urethral catheterisation being much higher [13]. Unlike PVR measurement, therefore, accuracy for uroflowmetry, subject to appropriate regular uroflowmeter calibration, should not be an issue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…This accuracy compares favourably with the ± 20-25% for the most accurate ultrasonic techniques for PVR measurement with the potential error using urethral catheterisation being much higher [13]. Unlike PVR measurement, therefore, accuracy for uroflowmetry, subject to appropriate regular uroflowmeter calibration, should not be an issue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…An alternative to using conventional ultrasound would be to use an automatic portable device such as the BladderScan ® [ 4 , 31-33 ]. These devices have the advantages of being very simple and quick to use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Focusing on ultrasonographic parameters, the preoperative residual volume was easy to assess using standard ultrasound measures [20] [21]. In a review about ultrasonographic measurement of residual volume, Haylen considers it as a good tool for assessing bladder-emptying function [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%