2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-008-0597-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uroflowmetry: its current clinical utility for women

Abstract: Uroflowmetry, the simple, non-invasive measurement of urine flow over time during micturition, has a long and interesting history, clear definitions, a clear purpose in screening for voiding difficulty and, most importantly, technical accuracy. Data interpretation is currently limiting its clinical utility, despite appropriate analysis being available in long-standing existing research. The main clinically important numerical parameters are the maximum and average urine flow rates and the voided volume. Urine … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(7, 46) Since uroflow rates and residual urine volume relative to total bladder volume are dependent on voided volume, the Liverpool nomogram is useful for interpreting uroflowmetry, (47) particularly to identify false-positive findings in patients who void less than 150 mL. (48) As observed previously, (49, 50) a small proportion, (i.e., 23% in this study), of asymptomatic women have uroflow abnormalities. Therefore, the diagnosis of voiding dysfunction should be based on an integrated consideration of clinical features and uroflowmetry findings, supplemented as necessary by urodynamic studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…(7, 46) Since uroflow rates and residual urine volume relative to total bladder volume are dependent on voided volume, the Liverpool nomogram is useful for interpreting uroflowmetry, (47) particularly to identify false-positive findings in patients who void less than 150 mL. (48) As observed previously, (49, 50) a small proportion, (i.e., 23% in this study), of asymptomatic women have uroflow abnormalities. Therefore, the diagnosis of voiding dysfunction should be based on an integrated consideration of clinical features and uroflowmetry findings, supplemented as necessary by urodynamic studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…2 shows an increase in Qmax with increasing voided volume for SAH (blue) and TAH (red). The black line indicates the 50th percentile of the Liverpool nomogram calculated using the formula for the female nomogram: Ln(Qmax) = 0.511 + 0.505 Â Ln(Voided volume) [22,23]. The best logarithmic fits for our two surgical groups (red and blue lines) are slightly lower than the Liverpool nomogram but within normal range and with very similar slopes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Several studies have established maximum urine flow rates to be greater than 12 mL/s [13,16]. According to the most recent ICS guidelines, abnormally slow flow rates have been determined as under the tenth percentile of the Liverpool nomogram which takes into account the voided volume [17,18]. Abnormalities in the flow pattern or rate can be due to various pathologies.…”
Section: Noninvasive Uroflowmetrymentioning
confidence: 99%