1995
DOI: 10.1002/pssb.2221880206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The accurate numerical evaluation of half‐order Fermi‐Dirac Integrals

Abstract: An efficient algorithm for the direct evaluation of Fermi-Dirac integrals of half orders is presented. The computational scheme consists of a modified trapezoidal rule which exactly corrects for the loss of accuracy caused by the presence of poles of the integrand. The analysis of the scheme leads to useful error bounds which indicate the quadrature scheme to be rapidly convergent. As much as 16 steps of trapezoidal summation along with at most 9 steps of pole correction can provide an accuracy of one part in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8c and 8d respectively). Numerical integration was performed using the function fermi.m in Matlab® [45]. Here, we see that the Seebeck, as calculated from Equation 3, fits the experimental data quite well when r=0, which is consistent with phononlimited scattering in 2D and captures the relative change in the Seebeck as a function of the carrier concentration induced by the backgate voltage.…”
Section: Calculation Of Seebeck Coefficient and Fermi Level (With Ressupporting
confidence: 70%
“…8c and 8d respectively). Numerical integration was performed using the function fermi.m in Matlab® [45]. Here, we see that the Seebeck, as calculated from Equation 3, fits the experimental data quite well when r=0, which is consistent with phononlimited scattering in 2D and captures the relative change in the Seebeck as a function of the carrier concentration induced by the backgate voltage.…”
Section: Calculation Of Seebeck Coefficient and Fermi Level (With Ressupporting
confidence: 70%
“…These equations are just the Einstein relation, written in a form that is valid at all temperatures. In three dimensions χ e must be evaluated numerically, 24 but in the non-degenerate limit Eq. 4 reduces to the familiar expression D e = µ e k B T /e.…”
Section: A Ambipolar Diffusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, F j ͑͒ = ͐ 0 ϱ ͓x j / exp͑x − ͒ +1͔dx is the jth order Fermi integral and is evaluated numerically. 7 N, m d , and m refer to number of conduction valleys, density of states ͑DOS͒ effective mass, and conductivity effective mass, intrinsic to the material. D and a are the electron gas dimensionality factor ͑D =3,2,1 for bulk material, quantum well, and nanowire͒ and relevant length scale ͑e.g., quantum well/nanowire thick-ness͒ pertinent to the device under consideration, respectively.…”
Section: ͑4͒mentioning
confidence: 99%