2016
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10869
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The acetyllysine reader BRD3R promotes human nuclear reprogramming and regulates mitosis

Abstract: It is well known that both recipient cells and donor nuclei demonstrate a mitotic advantage as observed in the traditional reprogramming with somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT). However, it is not known whether a specific mitotic factor plays a critical role in reprogramming. Here we identify an isoform of human bromodomain-containing 3 (BRD3), BRD3R (BRD3 with Reprogramming activity), as a reprogramming factor. BRD3R positively regulates mitosis during reprogramming, upregulates a large set of mitotic genes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, overexpression of the acetyllysine reader BRD3R has been shown to increase reprogramming efficiency in human cells (Shao et al, ). Genes upregulated by BRD3R are associated with mitosis promoting proliferation at early stages of reprogramming (Shao et al, ). Similar to TP53 knockdown, overexpression of BRD3R in BEFs did not have any effect on reprogramming efficiency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Third, overexpression of the acetyllysine reader BRD3R has been shown to increase reprogramming efficiency in human cells (Shao et al, ). Genes upregulated by BRD3R are associated with mitosis promoting proliferation at early stages of reprogramming (Shao et al, ). Similar to TP53 knockdown, overexpression of BRD3R in BEFs did not have any effect on reprogramming efficiency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lentiviral vectors used were: pHAGE-hSTEMCCA (Sommer et al, 2009), pSIN4-EF2-hOSKIM (Ross et al, 2010), and pLM-fSV2A (hOSKM) (Papapetrou et al, 2011) that encode polycistronic hOCT4, hSOX2, hcMYC and hKLF4, pLenti-EF1α-GFP, pLenti-EF1α-hNANOG, pLVH-EF1α-BRD3R (Shao et al, 2016), pLKO.1-shMBD3, pLKO.1-shTP53, and pLenti-CMV-bmiR302/367. Retroviral vectors used were: pMXs-GFP, pMXs-bOCT4, pMXs-bSOX2, pMXs-bKLF4, pMXs-bcMYC, and pMXS-bNANOG.…”
Section: Virus Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the reads from our RNA-seq (GSE66798) [26] and the reads from the experiments GSE71645 [27], GSE59528 [28] and GSE36552 [47] were mapped to the human reference genome (GRCh37/hg19) using the STAR aligner [29] guided by a gene transfer file (Ensembl GTF version GRCh37.70).…”
Section: Bioinformaticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversion of fibroblasts into iPSCs involves dramatic changes in cell morphology and establishes a unique cellular colony characteristic of PSC culture. In fact, high quality iPS cell lines can be established by selecting colonies with the characteristic cell and colony morphology without a reporter [7,8,20], and automatic imaging system can be used for identification of high quality iPSC colonies [21]. GO analyses of reprogramome reveal that 22 and 23 such GO terms are associated with the downreprogramome and upreprogramome, respectively (Table S6).…”
Section: Profiling and Quantification Of Reprogramming In Cell Morphomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…iPSC reprogramming from human fibroblasts is a prolonged and stochastic process with a very low efficiency [4][5][6]. One reason for this inefficient conversion of cell fates is probably the great expanse of reprogramming required [7,8]. Although it is considered to be extensive as well as intensive, the degree of iPSC reprogramming has not been determined quantitatively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%