1993
DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90649-b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The acidic transcriptional activation domains of VP16 and p53 bind the cellular replication protein A and stimulate in vitro BPV-1 DNA replication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

11
234
0
2

Year Published

1994
1994
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 317 publications
(247 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
11
234
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The data in Figure 7A can be globally fit to a two site binding model (see Materials and Methods) yielding macroscopic binding constants for the first (dT) 18 molecule, K 1,obs = (2.1±0.2)×10 7 M −1 and for the second (dT) 18 molecule, K 2,obs = (1.3±0.5)×10 5 M −1 , with corresponding values of quenching, Q 1 =0.23±0.01 and Q 2 =0.33±0.01 (see Table 3). Similar experiments performed with (dT) 16 also show that two moles of (dT) 16 can bind per mole of scRPA at saturation (data not shown).…”
Section: Sedimentation Equilibrium Studies Of Scrpa Binding To (Dt) 30supporting
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The data in Figure 7A can be globally fit to a two site binding model (see Materials and Methods) yielding macroscopic binding constants for the first (dT) 18 molecule, K 1,obs = (2.1±0.2)×10 7 M −1 and for the second (dT) 18 molecule, K 2,obs = (1.3±0.5)×10 5 M −1 , with corresponding values of quenching, Q 1 =0.23±0.01 and Q 2 =0.33±0.01 (see Table 3). Similar experiments performed with (dT) 16 also show that two moles of (dT) 16 can bind per mole of scRPA at saturation (data not shown).…”
Section: Sedimentation Equilibrium Studies Of Scrpa Binding To (Dt) 30supporting
confidence: 73%
“…The data in Figure 7A can be globally fit to a two site binding model (see Materials and Methods) yielding macroscopic binding constants for the first (dT) 18 molecule, K 1,obs = (2.1±0.2)×10 7 M −1 and for the second (dT) 18 molecule, K 2,obs = (1.3±0.5)×10 5 M −1 , with corresponding values of quenching, Q 1 =0.23±0.01 and Q 2 =0.33±0.01 (see Table 3). Similar experiments performed with (dT) 16 also show that two moles of (dT) 16 can bind per mole of scRPA at saturation (data not shown).The maximum stoichiometries for the binding of (dT) L as a function of L are plotted in Figure 7C. Clearly, for the binding of (dT) 16 or (dT) 18 , there is sufficient room remaining within the scRPA binding site to form a stable interaction with at least part of a second oligodeoxynucleotide.…”
supporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…RPA2 is capable of complex formation with the tumor-suppressor protein p53 modulating the p53-mediated DNA damage checkpoint response by sequestering p53 and preventing the transcriptional activation of genes involved in DNA repair. 26,27 It has been proposed that RPA2 overexpression might effectively inactivate p53, thus allowing cells with damaged DNA to proceed through the cell cycle. 20 Specific interactions have also been demonstrated between RPA2 and menin, another tumor-suppressor protein, whose gene-MEN1-is disrupted in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 and which is postulated to participate in the maintenance of genomic integrity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Links between RPA and transcription have been postulated based on the observed interactions between RPA and Gal4, VP16, p53, Stat3, RBT1 and menin. [10][11][12][13][14][15] This protein is present in cells as a heterotrimeric complex consisting of three subunits which, in order of decreasing size, have been designated as RPA1 (70 kDa), RPA2 (32 kDa) and RPA3 (14 kDa). [16][17][18][19] Recently, RPA complex has been identified as an autoantigen in breast cancer patients thus adding another member to the growing list of cancer autoantigens known to play important role in cell proliferation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%