1998
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.3.861
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The acquisition of skilled motor performance: Fast and slow experience-driven changes in primary motor cortex

Abstract: Behavioral and neurophysiological studies suggest that skill learning can be mediated by discrete, experience-driven changes within specific neural representations subserving the performance of the trained task. We have shown that a few minutes of daily practice on a sequential finger opposition task induced large, incremental performance gains over a few weeks of training. These gains did not generalize to the contralateral hand nor to a matched sequence of identical component movements, suggesting that a lat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

67
898
5
46

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,203 publications
(1,016 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
67
898
5
46
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, both the ROI analysis (Fig.3) and the subjective evaluation score (Fig.5) showed the two-week practice period did not result in any further increase in either the level of BOLD signal or the perception of task performance. The seemingly plateaued level of activation that we have seen in this study is in accordance with other behavioral/neuroimaging studies whereby newly acquired motor skill, once rapidly consolidated ('fast learning'), tapers off in terms of both performance and functional representation in the long term [Karni et al, 1998;Muellbacher et al, 2002;Krakauer and Shadmehr 2006]. However the current study does not provide enough data to examine this 'learning curve' effect and calls for the examination of the longitudinal studies extending to longer terms beyond the tested two-week practice period.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Meanwhile, both the ROI analysis (Fig.3) and the subjective evaluation score (Fig.5) showed the two-week practice period did not result in any further increase in either the level of BOLD signal or the perception of task performance. The seemingly plateaued level of activation that we have seen in this study is in accordance with other behavioral/neuroimaging studies whereby newly acquired motor skill, once rapidly consolidated ('fast learning'), tapers off in terms of both performance and functional representation in the long term [Karni et al, 1998;Muellbacher et al, 2002;Krakauer and Shadmehr 2006]. However the current study does not provide enough data to examine this 'learning curve' effect and calls for the examination of the longitudinal studies extending to longer terms beyond the tested two-week practice period.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This design also allowed us to determine whether performance of novel motor tasks improves with repetition in middle-aged adults. We hypothesised that performance would improve in Group-2 (consistent with short-term adaptions in motor performance with repetition [17]), but that the presence of pain would be associated with worse performance in Group-1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The latter findings are consistent with other studies which suggest that a striatal dysfunction does not affect the learning of an incremental perceptual-motor skill at the very beginning (i.e., Session 1, fast learning stage), but does so in the later (i.e., slow learning phase) stages of the acquisition process (Doyon et al, 1997a(Doyon et al, , 1997b(Doyon et al, , 1998(Doyon et al, , 1996b. Thus, this suggests that PD does not impair performance during the fast learning stage in which considerable improvement in performance can be seen within a single training session, but, instead, that it produces a deficit in the slow learning stage during which further gains are usually observed across several sessions of practice (Karni, 1996;Karni, Meyer, Rey-Hipolito, Jezzard, Adams, Turner, & Ungerleider, 1998).…”
Section: Random Version Of the Srt Task: Perceptual-motor Skill Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%