1995
DOI: 10.4135/9781412986120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Active Interview

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
1,024
0
64

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,777 publications
(1,145 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
1,024
0
64
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Holstein and Gubrium (1995), one of the purposes of an active interview is to ask the participants to assume different perspectives, to look at their experiences in new ways. Thus, I asked the participants in this study not only to tell me stories of how they interacted with their new in-laws, but also to consider their experiences from different perspectives.…”
Section: Interpretive Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Holstein and Gubrium (1995), one of the purposes of an active interview is to ask the participants to assume different perspectives, to look at their experiences in new ways. Thus, I asked the participants in this study not only to tell me stories of how they interacted with their new in-laws, but also to consider their experiences from different perspectives.…”
Section: Interpretive Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a conscientious interviewer, I began thematizing the data during the interview itself, by connecting ideas and probing for more details on particular productive themes that I identified while the participant was speaking (Holstein & Gubrium, 1995). I also made notes after each interview, recording my general impression of the interview and how it enlarged my vision of the in-law relationship, similar to what van Manen (1990) terms the wholistic approach to thematizing.…”
Section: Thematic Analysis and Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies shared the same broad aim to explore the gendered beliefs, assumptions and practices of ECE staff. They also shared the same methodological approach to the conducting of dialogic interviews with teachers (Blaise, 2005;Holstein and Gubrium, 1995;Rapley, 2001) …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a dialogue, the differences in viewpoints were likely to surface and become clear. The workshop was therefore organized as a focus group, by which it is possible to highlight agreements and disagreements on an issue within a group as well as explore how participants construct and reconstruct their viewpoints when challenged by others (Holstein and Gubrium, 1995). This communication could provide a chance to exchange motives, values, and interests and give the participants an opportunity to develop a mutual understanding and respect for the different views .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%