2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2014.08.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The activity and mechanism study of Fe–Mn–Ce/γ-Al 2 O 3 catalyst for low temperature selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH 3

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
58
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
58
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For Fe(0.2)-Ti catalysts, three deconvoluted reduction peaks were displayed in the temperature range of 200-800˝C, reflecting the reductive nature of the iron species. The reduction peaks centered at 354 and 394˝C, which indicated greater intensity, can be assigned to the reduction of Fe 2 O 3 to Fe 2+ [5,22,23]. The splitting signal we detected may have been due to the various interactions of Fe with Ti or the reduction of Fe 3+ located in different sites within the catalyst structure [22].…”
Section: H 2 -Tpr Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For Fe(0.2)-Ti catalysts, three deconvoluted reduction peaks were displayed in the temperature range of 200-800˝C, reflecting the reductive nature of the iron species. The reduction peaks centered at 354 and 394˝C, which indicated greater intensity, can be assigned to the reduction of Fe 2 O 3 to Fe 2+ [5,22,23]. The splitting signal we detected may have been due to the various interactions of Fe with Ti or the reduction of Fe 3+ located in different sites within the catalyst structure [22].…”
Section: H 2 -Tpr Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…After Ce doping, the H 2 -TPR profile of Fe(0.2)-Ce(0.4)-Ti catalysts showed enhanced reduction peaks. The reduction peaks at 370˝C and 402˝C, which were similar to that of Fe(0.2)-Ti catalysts, were attributed to the reduction of Fe 2 O 3 to Fe 2+ while the peaks at 466˝C can be regarded as the reduction of the uppermost layer of Ce 4+ to Ce 3+ [23][24][25]. The broad reduction peaks at 628˝C can potentially be ascribed to the reduction of Fe 2+ to Fe 0 and the deeper interior of CeO 2 and bulk CeO 2 [4,25,26].…”
Section: H 2 -Tpr Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Nevertheless, NO conversion by Mn-Ce/Al2O3 decreased quickly to 58% when SO2 and H2O were introduced into the gas flow simultaneously and the NO conversion was nearly stable over the next 124 h. The NO conversion then increased quickly to 70%, after the SO2 and H2O were removed. Meanwhile, the passivation effect was noticeably enhanced in the copresence of SO2 and H2O because in the atmosphere with O2 and H2O, SO2 reacts with NH3 to form (NH4)2SO4 and NH4HSO4, which are deposited on the catalyst surface, resulting in its deactivation [14]. According to the above results, it can be concluded that the Mn-Ce/Al2O3 catalyst exhibits some degree of SO2 and H2O resistance and that SO2 has a more significant inhibiting effect on the NH3-SCR catalytic activity than H2O [22,23].…”
Section: Effects Of So2 and H2o On No Removal Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Manganese oxides (MnO x ) have been extensively studied and proven to be highly active for low-temperature SCR of NO with NH 3 since they contain various types of labile oxygen species, which are essential for completing the catalytic cycle [12][13][14][15][16]. Researchers have also developed various Mn-based catalysts, such as MnO x /Al 2 O 3 [15], MnO x /TiO 2 [16,17] andMn-Ce-SnO 2 [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, abundant catalysts at low temperature have been explored such as transitional metals (Mn, Cu, Ce, Fe, Co, Mo) [1013], novel metals (Pt, Pd) [14], and metal ion-exchange zeolite catalysts [15]. The Mn-based catalyst is one of the most active metal oxide catalysts for high N 2 selectivity at low temperature and is recognised by many researchers as a potential alternative for the common catalyst.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%