1987
DOI: 10.2307/1179376
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Activity Structure of Lesson Segments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Equally, while new technologies broaden the range of tools and resources available to support school mathematics, they present the challenge of building a coherent resource system (Amarel, 1983) of compatible elements that function in a complementary manner and which participants are capable of using effectively. Likewise, innovation may call for adaptation of the established repertoire of activity formats that frame the action and interaction of participants during particular types of classroom episode (Burns & Anderson, 1987;Burns & Lash, 1986), and combine to create prototypical activity structures or cycles for particular styles of lesson (Monaghan, 2004). Moreover, incorporating new tools and resources into lessons requires teachers to develop their curriculum script for a mathematical topic.…”
Section: A Practitioner Model Of the Contribution Of Technology Use Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equally, while new technologies broaden the range of tools and resources available to support school mathematics, they present the challenge of building a coherent resource system (Amarel, 1983) of compatible elements that function in a complementary manner and which participants are capable of using effectively. Likewise, innovation may call for adaptation of the established repertoire of activity formats that frame the action and interaction of participants during particular types of classroom episode (Burns & Anderson, 1987;Burns & Lash, 1986), and combine to create prototypical activity structures or cycles for particular styles of lesson (Monaghan, 2004). Moreover, incorporating new tools and resources into lessons requires teachers to develop their curriculum script for a mathematical topic.…”
Section: A Practitioner Model Of the Contribution Of Technology Use Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drawing from prior research on teaching in general and on early studies of technology integration, the framework identifies five structuring features of classroom practice, which bear crucially on incorporation of technology within classroom practice. These are working environment (e.g., Horne-Martin, 2002;Rivlin & Weinstein, 1984), resource system (e.g., Cohen, Raudenbush, & Ball, 2002), activity format (e.g., Burns & Anderson, 1987), curriculum script (e.g., Leinhardt, Putnam, Stein, & Baxter, 1991;Putnam, 1987) and time economy (e.g., Assude, 2005). These key structuring features of classroom teaching indicate the corresponding aspects of professional reasoning and craft knowledge that teachers must develop in order to successfully incorporate new technologies (see Table 1).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classroom activity is organised around formats for action and interaction which frame the contributions of teacher and students to particular lesson segments (Burns & Anderson, 1987;Burns & Lash, 1986). The crafting of lessons around familiar activity formats and their supporting classroom routines helps to make them flow smoothly in a focused, predictable and fluid way (Leinhardt, Weidman & Hammond, 1987).…”
Section: Activity Formatmentioning
confidence: 99%