The Acute Effects of Interrupting Prolonged Sitting Time in Adults with Standing and Light-Intensity Walking on Biomarkers of Cardiometabolic Health in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Abstract

Background Increasing evidence highlights that accumulating sitting time in prolonged bouts is detrimental to cardiometabolic health. Objectives This systematic review aimed to compare the effects of fractionating prolonged sitting with frequent short bouts of standing and light-intensity walking on cardiometabolic health markers and conduct a meta-analysis for differences in systolic blood pressure (SBP), postprandial glucose and insulin. Methods Experimental randomised crossover trials with at least three intervention arms that assessed interrupting sitting with frequent short bouts of standing and light-intensity walking over a single day compared to a prolonged sitting condition were retrieved. These studies measured at minimum one marker of cardiometabolic health in adults > 18 years. An electronic search was completed on the 2nd of August 2021, searching PubMed and Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library and APA PsycINFO. Risk of bias was assessed using a modified Downs and Black checklist. A meta-analysis was conducted using calculated Cohen’s d quantifying the magnitude of difference between experimental conditions. Results Seven studies met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review. All seven studies were included within the meta-analysis for postprandial glucose, four studies were pooled for postprandial insulin and three for SBP. Biomarkers of cardiometabolic health were discussed qualitatively if fewer than three studies measured and reported the variable. A meta-analysis of seven acute, 1-day randomised crossover trials that sampled mixed-sex adults (aged > 18 years) who were predominately overweight or participants with obesity found that standing as an interruption to prolonged sitting significantly reduced postprandial glucose (∆ = − 0.31, 95% CI − 0.60, − 0.03; z = − 2.15, p < 0.04) but had no significant effect on insulin or SBP. Light-intensity walking was shown to significantly attenuate postprandial glucose (∆ = − 0.72, 95% CI − 1.03, − 0.41; z = − 4.57, p < 0.001) and insulin (∆ = − 0.83, 95% CI − 1.18, − 0.48; z = − 4.66, p < 0.001) compared to continued sitting. When comparing light-intensity walking breaks compared to standing breaks a significant reduction in glucose (∆ = − 0.30, 95% CI − 0.52, − 0.08; z = -2.64, p < 0.009) and insulin (∆ = − 0.54, 95% CI − 0.75, − 0.33; z = -4.98, p < 0.001) was observed. Both standing and light-intensity walking showed no effect on SBP. Conclusions Frequent short interruptions of standing significantly attenuated postprandial glucose compared to prolonged sitting; however, light-intensity walking was found to represent a superior physical activity break. The feasibility and longitudinal implications of breaking sedentary behaviour with light-intensity walking should be investigated in a free-living setting. Registration Not available.

A large-scale observational study of the causal effects of a behavioral health nudge

“…This provides promising opportunities for implementing beneficial health strategies. In the context of the nudge we examined, interrupting sedentary time with short bouts of standing is beneficially associated with metabolic risk variables independently of total sedentary time, e.g., (10)(11)(12)(13)(14).…”

“…It can increase the risk of diabetes and cardiovascular diseases (2)(3)(4)(5), the risk of chronic diseases (6), and premature mortality even in individuals meeting physical activity guidelines (7)(8)(9). Conversely, interrupting prolonged sitting by standing has been shown to reduce these risks (10)(11)(12)(13)(14). Note that even short sprints of exercise have been shown to be of great health value (15,16).…”

Effectiveness of an intervention to reduce sedentary behaviour as a personalised secondary prevention strategy for patients with coronary artery disease: main outcomes of the SIT LESS randomised clinical trial

“…1 ). The predefined limit of prolonged sedentary bouts was by default set at ≥ 30 min, based on studies showing that sedentary bouts > 30 min are associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality compared to sitting time accumulated in shorter sedentary bouts (1 to 29 min) [ 24 , 25 ]. The SIT LESS programme was personalised at individual level, for example regarding the plan to achieve the selected goal of daily ST with discussing difficult situations and possible solutions that are applicable to the individual patient in the outpatient clinic.…”

The Role of Natural Factors that Optimize Redox Status in Combating Type 2 Diabetes

“…A recent meta-analysis in predominantly adults with overweight or obesity showed that as little as two to five minutes of light-intensity walking significantly reduced PPG levels compared to prolonged sitting [43]. This meta-analysis also found that the lightexercise-induced lowering of PPG was more effective in overweight individuals compared to individuals with obesity, suggesting that obesity imposes additional metabolic dysfunction [43,44]. Given the acknowledged importance of early intervention, it is critically important that this research be repeated in a pediatric population, perhaps, in a school setting.…”