The acute mechanism of the self-massage-induced effects of using a foam roller

Yoshimura, Akane; Sekine, Yuta; Schleip, Robert; Furusyo, Atsuya; Yamazaki, Kazuya; Inami, Takayuki; Murayama, Mitsuyoshi; Hirose, Norikazu

doi:10.1016/j.jbmt.2021.02.012

Cited by 14 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Ankle ROM increased to a similar extent (~1°) after all rolling conditions despite the differences in rolling technique, surface pattern, and the rate of perceived pain. Previous studies have also reported a small but significant increase in ankle ROM following bouts of FR [12,[15][16][17] and roller massager [18]. Apparently, the triceps surae muscle is less susceptible to the acute effects of FR [19].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 92%

“…The generalization of the findings from the present study must account for its main limitations and delimitations. There is a possibility of a non-local/crossover effect of the unilateral condition in the outcome of the bilateral condition [12,16,31,35]. However, the quasi-randomized-cross-over design was selected to reduce the time and cost of the study [36]; additionally, the "washout" period of 30-min was deemed to be sufficient considering that the crossover effect of FR in the ROM of the contralateral limb apparently dissipate within 10-15 min [12].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Comparison of Different Foam Rolling Protocols on Ankle Range of Motion, Strength, Muscle Activation and Jump Performance

Soares¹,

Almeida²,

Vasconcelos³

et al. 2022

Int'l Journal of Strength & Conditioning

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Foam rolling (FR) has been widely used with the intent to increase range of motion (ROM) before strength and power activities. At the moment, few studies have investigated practical strategies to control FR intensity. Purpose: The aim was to compare the effect (FR) intensity by different combinations of a smooth roller, grid roller, unilateral or bilateral rolling massage on the triceps suralis ROM, strength, muscle activation, and jump performance. Methods: Ten male (28±4 years, 175±5 cm, 81±13 kg) and ten female (29±4 years, 163±5 cm, 66±10 kg) recreationally trained performed two sessions of data collection that compared 4 combinations of rolling surface and technique: unilateral smooth roller (US), bilateral smooth roller (BS), unilateral grid roller (UG), and bilateral grid roller (BG). During all conditions, the triceps suralis was rolled for 2 sets of 60 s with 60 s of rest between sets. Rate of perceived pain (RPP) after the rolling protocol; peak force during a maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) (PF), muscle activation during a MVIC, and unilateral drop jump (UDJ) performance were measured before and after each condition. Results: The greatest RPP was reported in UG condition and the lowest RPP was reported in BS condition. All conditions increased ankle ROM to the same extent without subsequent effect on PF, muscle activity UDJ height, and UDJ contact time. Our data indicate that FR using different combinations of surface pattern and rolling techniques increased ankle ROM without a subsequent effect on drop jump performance, triceps suralis strength, and activation. Conclusion: In conclusion, practitioners could be encouraged to perform FR with mild discomfort and use a bilateral technique to save time. Keywords: Flexibility, self-myofascial release, electromyography, force, strength.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 92%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of Different Foam Rolling Protocols on Ankle Range of Motion, Strength, Muscle Activation and Jump Performance

Soares¹,

Almeida²,

Vasconcelos³

et al. 2022

Int'l Journal of Strength & Conditioning

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Self-massage techniques have been widely used in physiotherapy (e.g., treatment technique in therapeutic programs) (18) and in sports training to warm-up or muscle recovery (8). As a therapeutic technique, SM seems to decrease pain caused by musculoskeletal disorders through modulation of pain perception, such as increasing the pressure pain threshold (PPT) (18,83) (i.e., minimal pressure exerted for an individual to experience pain or discomfort) (26) and restoring limited joint range of motion (ROM) (49,79,80). Before a sports training session, a possible warm-up effect (13,29,79) may be able to promote possible beneficial effects in some athletic performance parameters (e.g., increased ROM, muscle strength, and sprint performance) (28,29,66,67), whereas after exercise, SM appears to help with recovery from exercise-induced muscle soreness (50,79).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The SM involves applying mechanical pressure on the soft tissues, and it is believed to produce different responses linked to psychological (e.g., relaxation) (83), physiological (e.g., circulatory changes), mechanical (e.g., changes in the soft tissues' stiffness) (63,66), and neurophysiological (e.g., changes in neuromuscular activity) pathways (73). The latter appears to be related to changes in the activity of the mechanoreceptors, proprioceptors, and nociceptors across different soft tissues (i.e., skin, fascia, and muscle) (51).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, the acute effects of SM on neurophysiological parameters remain contradictory. Although some studies have observed no changes (61,78,83), others have found increased PPT (16)(17)(18)(19)(20), which seems to be associated with reduced perceived pain by the activation of a pain modulator system (3). Considering the possible effects on proprioception, changes in muscle electrical activity (MEA) may occur following SM application.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Self-Massage Acute Effects on Pressure Pain Threshold, Muscular Electrical Activity, and Muscle Force Production: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Furlan,

Machado,

do Nascimento Petter

et al. 2024

Journal of Strength &Amp; Conditioning Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Furlan, MR, Machado, E, Petter, GdN, Barbosa, IM, Geremia, JM, and Glänzel, MH. Self-massage acute effects on pressure pain threshold, muscular electrical activity, and muscle force production: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Strength Cond Res 38(3): 620–635, 2024—Self-massage (SM) is often used in physiotherapy and sports training programs. However, the SM acute effects on pressure pain threshold (PPT), muscle electrical activity (MEA), and muscle force production remain unclear. A meta-analytical review was performed to verify the SM acute effects on neuromuscular responses in healthy adults or athletes. The review (CRD42021254656) was performed in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases. A synthesis of the included studies was performed, and both the risk of bias and the evidence certainty level were assessed through the PEDro scale and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach, respectively. Nineteen studies were included, 5 evaluated the PPT, 7 the thigh muscles' MEA, and 15 the lower-limb strength. The SM application induces moderate increases in quadriceps' PPT (5 studies; standardized mean difference [SMD]: 0.487; 95% CI 0.251–0.723; p < 0.001; I 2 = 0%). We found no SM effects on the hamstrings and plantar flexors' MEA. Also, we observed small increases in knee extensors' concentric torque (2 studies; SMD: 0.288; 95% CI 0.088–0.489; p = 0.005; I 2 = 0%), without effects in isometric muscle strength, eccentric torque, and rate of force development. Grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation analysis showed high and low certainty levels for the SM effects on quadriceps' PPT and muscle strength, respectively. Self-massage pressure-volume application seems to be a determining factor in inducing changes in these parameters, and it may vary among the treated muscles, where a higher pressure-volume application is required for increasing knee flexors and plantar flexors' PPT and strength. Thus, new studies with better methodological quality should be performed to strengthen this evidence.

show abstract

The contralateral effects of foam rolling on range of motion and muscle performance

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A single bout of foam rolling (FR) can acutely increase joint range of motion (ROM) without detrimental effects on subsequent muscle performance. Similarly, long-term FR training can increase ROM, while muscle performance seems to be unaffected. Although the acute and long-term effects of FR on the treated muscle are understood, the impact of FR on the contralateral side is not well known. Therefore, this scoping review aims to summarize the current evidence on the acute and long-term effect of FR on the ipsilateral limb on ROM and muscle performance (i.e., maximum force, rate of force development, jump height) for the contralateral (non-treated) limb. Potential explanatory mechanisms are also discussed. There is evidence that a single bout of FR on the ipsilateral limb increases ROM of the contralateral limb; however, evidence is limited for long-term effects. The most likely mechanism for contralateral ROM increases is a reduced perception of pain. With regard to isolated muscle contractions, no changes in muscle performance (i.e., maximum voluntary isometric contraction, maximum voluntary dynamic contraction) were found in the contralateral limb after a single bout of FR on the ipsilateral limb. Notably, only one study reported large impairments in rate of force development of the contralateral limb following FR on the ipsilateral leg, possibly due to decreased motor unit recruitment. Furthermore, to date there are only two studies examining the long-term FR training of the ipsilateral limb on performance (i.e., maximal strength and jump performance) which reported moderate improvements. Although, trivial to very large changes on a variety of parameters were found in this study, the functional and practical relevance of our findings should be interpreted with caution.

show abstract

The acute mechanism of the self-massage-induced effects of using a foam roller

Cited by 14 publications

References 30 publications

Comparison of Different Foam Rolling Protocols on Ankle Range of Motion, Strength, Muscle Activation and Jump Performance

Comparison of Different Foam Rolling Protocols on Ankle Range of Motion, Strength, Muscle Activation and Jump Performance

Self-Massage Acute Effects on Pressure Pain Threshold, Muscular Electrical Activity, and Muscle Force Production: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The contralateral effects of foam rolling on range of motion and muscle performance

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About