2018
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1810.03455
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Adjoint Petrov-Galerkin Method for Non-Linear Model Reduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, we assume that the structure of the ROM closure model function g is similar to the structure of the Galerkin model function f and we utilize a least squares approach to determine the shape of g. We emphasize that, without loss of generality, our DD-VMS-ROM framework can be formulated by utilizing a supervised machine learning approach [57,64,65,66], a topic that we would like to explore in the future. Finally, we intend to explore the extension of the new DD-VMS-ROM to the Petrov-Galerkin framework [9,10,20,52].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In the present study, we assume that the structure of the ROM closure model function g is similar to the structure of the Galerkin model function f and we utilize a least squares approach to determine the shape of g. We emphasize that, without loss of generality, our DD-VMS-ROM framework can be formulated by utilizing a supervised machine learning approach [57,64,65,66], a topic that we would like to explore in the future. Finally, we intend to explore the extension of the new DD-VMS-ROM to the Petrov-Galerkin framework [9,10,20,52].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another ROM closure strategy that is related to the VMS-ROM framework is the adjoint Petrov-Galerkin method [52] (see [9,10,20] for related work), which is based on the Mori-Zwanzig (MZ) formalism [19,38]. In the MZ-ROM approach, the ROM closure model is represented by a memory term that depends on the temporal history of the resolved scales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Linear basis ROMs have achieved considerable success in complex problems such as turbulent flows [12,13,14] and combustion instabilities [15,16]. However, despite the choice of optimal test spaces afforded by Petrov-Galerkin methods [17], and closure modeling [18,19,20,21], the linear trial space becomes ineffective in advection-dominated problems and many multiscale problems in general. While the associated challenges can be addressed to a certain degree by using adaptive basis [22,23,24], some of the fundamental challenges persist.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%