The Adoption of Bottom-up Governance in China's Homeowner Associations

Abstract

Since China's marketization‐featured housing reform, homeowner associations have played a greater role in neighbourhood governance. Using the theory of social movements and organizations, this article investigates how homeowner associations strategically reorganize themselves to achieve their goals. Our survey in Beijing suggests that about half of the homeowner associations have adopted bottom‐up governance structures, which are not specified in governmental regulations. We find that such innovations are more likely to occur when a neighbourhood needs grassroots participation to deal with external grievances, especially developer‐related issues, or to overcome its powerlessness due to little access to the polity. We also find that homeowner associations are more likely to adopt bottom‐up structures when their leaders believe strongly in resident participation or actively engage in extra‐organizational professional activities as a means to overcome infrastructure deficit.

The Evolution of the Housing Market and Its Socioeconomic Impacts in the Post‐reform People's Republic of China: A Survey of the Literature

“…In July 1998, in an unexpectedly radical manner, the State Council ordered the in‐kind distribution of welfare housing to be rapidly terminated. Most literature considers the complete abandonment of the People's Republic of China's employer‐based welfare housing program to be a key component of the Chinese government's stimulus package to counteract the negative shocks of the 1997 Asian financial crisis (Man, ; Wang, Shao et al ., ). An overwhelming majority of the public housing stock was privatized within a few years.…”

“…Wang, Shao et al . () attempted to link the Chinese experience of the housing system between 1998 and 2010 with theoretical debates about neoliberal housing regimes, which involve reduced state intervention and the assertion of the superiority of market processes in the housing sector. Zhu () employed the theory of policy networks to explain how the old policy network hindered the shift of the housing policy paradigm even after the hierarchy of housing policy goals had been altered .…”

“…Wang, Shao et al . (), however, interpreted the swift responses of the housing policy to internal and external economic shocks as evidence that the People's Republic of China's urban neoliberalism is a contingent type rather than the ideal type of neoliberalism . Wang, Shao et al .…”

Coping with Multiple Institutional Logics: Temporal Process of Institutional Work during the Emergence of the One Foundation in China

“…During China's economic and societal transition, social organizations face increasing tensions between two divergent societal-level logics. The state logic refers to the orientation of the state and its entities in securing political and social order (Dobbin & Dowd, 1997) by regulating and supervising social organizations (Wang, Yin, & Zhou, 2012). Because of Chinese authoritarian regime, the state logic can be represented at different administrative levels.…”

Governing the Neighborhood with Confucian Ideas

“…For example, there were cases of civic actions such as picketing, freeway blocking, litigations in local courts, petitioning to higher authorities, sit-ins in government offices, and even of participating and campaigning in local government elections (Wang 2008, 22-23). Most importantly, some neighborhoods did succeed in forming their HOA, as shown by its relatively reasonable establishment rate (Wang, Yin & Zhou, 2011), and sustain their operation. How can one make sense of their persistent endeavors to neighborhood governance and explain their success given the unfavorable historical and political contexts?…”