1984
DOI: 10.2307/1240918
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Adoption of Reduced Tillage: The Role of Human Capital and Other Variables

Abstract: This paper presents a model of adoption behavior and explains differences econometrically in farmers' decisions to adopt reduced‐tillage practices and in the efficiency of farmers' adoption decisions. The empirical results, obtained from microdata, show that the probability of adopting reduced tillage in corn enterprises differs widely across farms and depends on soil characteristics, cropping systems, and size of farming operation. The results also show that farmers' schooling enhances the efficiency of the a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
208
0
6

Year Published

1990
1990
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 427 publications
(230 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
16
208
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The features of probit and logit models make interpretation of resulting coefficients unique from those obtained under an LPM. Of the two, probit models are often seen as better suited for experimental data [25] and do not enable precision robustness as they fail to allow the modeler to adjust for covariates. Logit models guarantee the estimated probability increases and never cross the range of 0 to 1, and are the most commonly and widely applied.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The features of probit and logit models make interpretation of resulting coefficients unique from those obtained under an LPM. Of the two, probit models are often seen as better suited for experimental data [25] and do not enable precision robustness as they fail to allow the modeler to adjust for covariates. Logit models guarantee the estimated probability increases and never cross the range of 0 to 1, and are the most commonly and widely applied.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information sources AC with further reference by the producers are the National Institute of Forestry, Agriculture and Livestock (INIFAP) and the International Center for Maize and Wheat Improvement (CIMMYT). Rahm and Huffman (1984); Westra and Olson (1997) Cuadro 2. Medidas de centralidad y de actores clave por tipo de productores en la difusión de innovaciones.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Education level is expected to have a positive influence on the use of improved crop and livestock husbandry practices, because of the assumed link between education and knowledge (Rahm and Huffman, 1984;Knowler and Bradshaw, 2007).…”
Section: Description Of Factors Explaining the Variation In Lwpmentioning
confidence: 99%