2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-017-1950-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Advantages of Viscous Dissipation Rate over Simplified Power Loss as a Fontan Hemodynamic Metric

Abstract: Flow efficiency through the Fontan connection is an important factor related to patient outcomes. It can be quantified using either a simplified power loss or a viscous dissipation rate metric. Though practically equivalent in simplified Fontan circulation models, these metrics are not identical. Investigation is needed to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of these metrics for their use in in vivo or more physiologically-accurate Fontan modeling. Thus, simplified power loss and viscous dissipation rate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Homogeneous material properties were assigned at the vessel wall. This study's primary hemodynamic metrics are power loss and hepatic flow distributions: their definitions adhere to previous studies [23,[45][46][47][48]].…”
Section: Hemodynamic Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Homogeneous material properties were assigned at the vessel wall. This study's primary hemodynamic metrics are power loss and hepatic flow distributions: their definitions adhere to previous studies [23,[45][46][47][48]].…”
Section: Hemodynamic Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A polyhedral mesh of approximately D IVC /20 mm elements was used in order to achieve mesh independent results, where D IVC is the diameter of the IVC. 19 All simulations were performed using ANSYS Fluent (Release 17.1) which is a finite volume pressurebased NavierStokes solver. Blood was modeled as a single-phase Newtonian fluid (μ=0.04 g/ (cm•s), ρ=1.06 g/cm3).…”
Section: Computational Fluid Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blood was modeled as a single-phase Newtonian fluid (μ=0.04 g/ (cm•s), ρ=1.06 g/cm3). The appropriate patient specific blood flow waveforms extracted from PC-MRI were used as boundary conditions for each TCPC inlet and outlet 19,20 . Twenty cardiac cycles were simulated to overcome transition effects and achieve period stability, using the final cycle for data analysis.…”
Section: Computational Fluid Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The capability of the catheterization method to accurately capture the highly dynamic and 3D flow and pressure fields is limited. In a recent in vivo study, 69 averaged pressures and velocities were used at the inlet and outlet sections, which have been shown to overestimate energy loss with 18%, 94 and are inherently associated with measurement errors because the position and size of the catheter inside the vessel will influence measured pressure and velocity values. For example, when a swirling, helical flow pattern is present, the central pressure measurement may not reflect the true pressure.…”
Section: Catheterization Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%