2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-82973-5_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Affordances of Leveraging Multilingual Repertoires in Scientific Reasoning Among Resettled Refugee Teens: Functions of Translanguaging in Scientific Reasoning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ryu and colleagues (Daniel et al, 2021; Ryu & Daniel, 2020; Ryu & Tuvilla, 2018; Ryu et al, 2020) designed and studied a community‐based afterschool STEM program that invited resettled Chin refugee high school students to learn about climate change. Chin people are ethnic minorities in Myanmar that comprise more than 30 different groups, each with unique cultural practices and named languages.…”
Section: Emerging Research In Science Education With Mlsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ryu and colleagues (Daniel et al, 2021; Ryu & Daniel, 2020; Ryu & Tuvilla, 2018; Ryu et al, 2020) designed and studied a community‐based afterschool STEM program that invited resettled Chin refugee high school students to learn about climate change. Chin people are ethnic minorities in Myanmar that comprise more than 30 different groups, each with unique cultural practices and named languages.…”
Section: Emerging Research In Science Education With Mlsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, youth strategically blended humor and STEM discourse, thus crafting a space for themselves and their peers in which diverse identities (e.g., a funny person, a person who cares about others) could contribute meaningfully to collaborative justice-oriented work. Second, youth drew flexibly and strategically from their wide range of linguistic and semiotic resources to engage in scientific sense-making and provide caring social support for others (Daniel et al, 2021). For example, in situations in which learners had different levels of proficiency in different named languages, they communicated by speaking in one named language while listening in another (e.g., A spoke to B in Hakha, and B responded to A in Falam) while also leveraging other semiotic resources, such as gaze and body language.…”
Section: Informal Learning Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%