The aftermath of COVID-19 pandemic period: barriers in implementation of social distancing at workplace

Abstract

PurposeThe study aims to investigate the barriers in implementing social distancing at the workplace as an aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic period.Design/methodology/approachStudy design consists of a review of literature, data collection and analysis. It encompasses identification, verification and analysis of the relationships among the barriers. Data have been collected from a panel of experts on matrix-type questionnaires from workplaces. Interpretive structural modeling (ISM) augmented with “Matrice d' Impacts Croise's Multiplication Appliquée a UN Classement (Cross Impact Matrix Multiplication Applied to Classification)” (MICMAC) for structural analysis.FindingsThe literature has identified twenty major barriers to implementing social distancing at the workplace. The research findings reveal/show that the barrier “matter of disrespect” occupies the bottom level in the ISM model. Therefore, it is the most critical barrier; whereas, employees with disabilities and “herding culture” are crucial as they occupy the next lowest level, therefore, are crucial. Moreover, there are ten barriers positioned in the middle of the model having moderate-severe effects, and seven falls on the top level of the model having relatively less severe effects. Results of MICMAC affirm and avow the results of ISM.Research limitations/implicationsThe study will have profound theoretical and practical implications for stakeholders since it provides lot of new useful and valuable information, gives relational insights and determines priorities subject to usual limitations of survey research.Originality/valueIt is an original attempt to make some sense of practicability of social distancing for stakeholders including policymakers, frontline health workers and public at large.

Till debt does us apart: Cross-country evidence on the relationship between microfinance prevalence and social distrust

“…For example, the variance of the incremental sample for every new wave may be correlated with some 'type' of countries added, which may affect overall variance. Another potential channel affecting variance across cross-sections may be shocks, such as Covid [65][66][67][68][69][70] in Wave 7, in which a tighter distribution of distrust is likely. The priors show microfinance intensity to be associated with distrust in poor as well as the ultra-poor according to all 3 measures of microfinance intensity.…”

Examining the convergence of dominant themes related to social entrepreneurship, NGOs and globalization–A systematic literature review

“…For starters, the SE’s social goal lies between for-profit and non-profit organizations [ 12 , 20 ]. Second, social entrepreneurs are classified as social innovators who develop new products, services, and technology to address a social need [ 21 , 22 ]. The third factor is social networks, which are linked groups of individuals and organizations that share information and resources.…”

Guest editorial: COVID-19 Pandemic and Health Informatics Part 2

“…They showed a positive correlation between the two. Lastly, Abbass et al (2022) found ten barriers to implementing social distancing at the workplace. Readers may also be interested in Kumar et al (2021), who attempted to simulate people's interaction due to economic reopening, concerning confirmed cases at various places as per changing situation has been made using data obtained from India at the early stage of COVID-19.…”