Microwave Materials Characterization 2012
DOI: 10.5772/51400
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Age-Dependence of Microwave Dielectric Parameters of Biological Tissues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Apart from the electrode placement, all impedance measurements were carried out identically to those for the gelatine phantoms. These trends are due to the water content that is evaporated (or absorbed) over time making the phantom drier [45]. The contact impedance response results obtained from the electrical model (discussed in more detail in Section V-E) were found to fit well with the experimental measurements of the gelatine phantoms.…”
Section: Ex Vivo Porcine Skin Fittingmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Apart from the electrode placement, all impedance measurements were carried out identically to those for the gelatine phantoms. These trends are due to the water content that is evaporated (or absorbed) over time making the phantom drier [45]. The contact impedance response results obtained from the electrical model (discussed in more detail in Section V-E) were found to fit well with the experimental measurements of the gelatine phantoms.…”
Section: Ex Vivo Porcine Skin Fittingmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The measurements also reveal that biological tissue is responding similarly to the application of heat treatment as the mean emissivity values increase after each application of heat treatment for all samples as summarized in Table 2. However, the mean emissivity values for the burn-damaged skin are different from sample to sample and this is due to the resistivity and the conductivity of the skin, as that varies from animal to animal [46,47,48]. The measurements presented in Figure 9 confirm that radiometry can distinguish between different burn depths as it provides different mean emissivity values after each application of localized heat treatment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The measurements in Figure 9 indicate that the mean emissivity values for the four samples before the application of heat treatments are in the range of 0.52–0.55. It is reasonable to find differences in the mean emissivity value of the skin as the samples were taken from different animals in which each animal has a different skin thickness and different dielectric properties [46,47]. The measurements also reveal that biological tissue is responding similarly to the application of heat treatment as the mean emissivity values increase after each application of heat treatment for all samples as summarized in Table 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 4 depicts the measured permittivity values of the human skin within the frequency range of 0.3-3.3 GHz, which was also considered as the reference. It is worth noting that the low-conductive materials have interesting properties, due to the lower absorption, and thus, the better penetration depth within the complex EM propagation medium [29,30].…”
Section: Composite Materials Development and Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%