2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2014.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The alcohol deprivation effect model for studying relapse behavior: A comparison between rats and mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

9
131
2
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
9
131
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This enhanced intake indicates that the HD animals were more sensitive to the four days of interruption to alcohol access, i.e. in the HD animals, this modified intermittent paradigm gave rise to an alcohol deprivation effect [34,35], which is typically not seen when using intermittent access models [22] and to our knowledge only has been reported in one previous study [36]. The alcohol deprivation effect found herein was not as pronounced as that described for some Wistar rats when deprived from alcohol after about two months of continuous access under a 4-bottle free-choice paradigm [35].…”
Section: Alcohol Intake Using Three Consecutive Days Of Intermittent mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This enhanced intake indicates that the HD animals were more sensitive to the four days of interruption to alcohol access, i.e. in the HD animals, this modified intermittent paradigm gave rise to an alcohol deprivation effect [34,35], which is typically not seen when using intermittent access models [22] and to our knowledge only has been reported in one previous study [36]. The alcohol deprivation effect found herein was not as pronounced as that described for some Wistar rats when deprived from alcohol after about two months of continuous access under a 4-bottle free-choice paradigm [35].…”
Section: Alcohol Intake Using Three Consecutive Days Of Intermittent mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…in the HD animals, this modified intermittent paradigm gave rise to an alcohol deprivation effect [34,35], which is typically not seen when using intermittent access models [22] and to our knowledge only has been reported in one previous study [36]. The alcohol deprivation effect found herein was not as pronounced as that described for some Wistar rats when deprived from alcohol after about two months of continuous access under a 4-bottle free-choice paradigm [35]. However, this alcohol access paradigm, with pronounced subgroup-dependent effects, including alcohol deprivation effects, has clinical validity and may be useful in future investigations of molecular, neuronal, neurochemical, or behavioral adaptations related to excessive alcohol intake as both individuals that escalate their intake over time (HD animals) and low-drinking individuals (LD animals) without escalation are to be distinguished [22].…”
Section: Alcohol Intake Using Three Consecutive Days Of Intermittent mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various paradigms of alcohol abuse have been proposed representing stages in the development of an AUD including models of voluntary consumption, binge-like ethanol drinking, dependence-like drinking, and relapse-like drinking (Vengeliene et al, 2014, Gilpin et al, 2009, Tabakoff and Hoffman, 2000). Two models that are often used to study pre-dependent ethanol drinking include “drinking in the dark” (DID) and continuous two-bottle choice (C2BC) procedures (Thiele and Navarro, 2014, Ozburn et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this model, renewed access to alcohol solutions after a period of deprivation for several days leads to a pronounced, although temporary, increase in voluntary alcohol intake in animals (Vengeliene et al, 2014;Eisenhardt et al, 2015). In rats, the ADE was attenuated by repeated subacute treatment with memantine and other NMDAR antagonists (Hölter et al, 2000;Vengeliene et al, 2005Vengeliene et al, , 2008). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, relapse behavior, as measured by the alcohol deprivation effect (ADE), is attenuated or blocked by several NMDAR and AMPAR antagonists (Hölter et al, 1996;Vengeliene et al, 2005Vengeliene et al, , 2008Sanchis-Segura et al, 2006;Holmes et al, 2013). Thus, there is some indication that glutamate receptors are, at least in part, involved in mediating the addictive properties of alcohol, but the neuroanatomical substrates and the specific contributions of AMPARs and NMDARs are not well understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%