2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2012.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The alliance innovation performance of R&D alliances—the absorptive capacity perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
190
0
28

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 261 publications
(226 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
8
190
0
28
Order By: Relevance
“…External collaboration does not substitute lacking or insufficient internal innovation capabilities; rather it increases complexity for firms (Lin et al, 2012). Thus, dealing with increasing complexity requires building stronger internal capabilities.…”
Section: Contributions and Managerial Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…External collaboration does not substitute lacking or insufficient internal innovation capabilities; rather it increases complexity for firms (Lin et al, 2012). Thus, dealing with increasing complexity requires building stronger internal capabilities.…”
Section: Contributions and Managerial Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potential absorptive capacity helps the firm to identify an appropriate partner and learn from it, while realised absorptive capacity enables the firm to deploy the knowledge acquired in innovation which enhances profit. Indeed, recent empirical work on interfirm learning and alliances has shown that firms with higher absorptive capacity tend to benefit more from external knowledge (e.g., de Jong and Freel, 2010;Lin et al, 2012).…”
Section: Literature Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leads to the optimal cognitive distance hypothesis which has been the subject of many studies. The consensus in the empirical literature is that technological or cognitive proximity between cooperation partners has an inverted 'U'-shaped relation with the value of learning the partners obtain (or, alternatively, the innovative potential of the alliance) (Lin et al, 2012;Gilsing et al, 2008;Nooteboom et al, 2007;Wuyts et al, 2005;Mowery et al, 1998). An understandability-novelty trade-off exists such that effective learning by interaction is better accomplished by limiting cognitive overlap while securing cognitive distance.…”
Section: Literature Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, alliance network management capabilities, precisely, coordination of inward (AC) and outward knowledge transfer processes, are stressed as critical. Lin et al (2012) converges with Gilsing et al (2008), with respect to technological distance and partner diversity, when emphasizing the importance for IP of not having too great a technological distance between AP´s partners, and the role of AC as a moderator of the negative effects of significant technological distance on IP. It contributes by underlining the importance of the proportion of R&D alliances in the AP and AC´s significant role when this proportion is particularly high.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%