The AME2016 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and references

Abstract

This paper is the second part of the new evaluation of atomic masses, AME2016. Using least-squares adjustments to all evaluated and accepted experimental data, described in Part I, we derive tables with numerical values and graphs to replace those given in AME2012. The first table lists the recommended atomic mass values and their uncertainties. It is followed by a table of the influences of data on primary nuclides, a table of various reaction and decay energies, and finally, a series of graphs of separation and decay energies. The last section of this paper lists all references of the input data used in the AME2016 and the NUBASE2016 evaluations (first paper in this issue).AMDC: http://amdc.impcas.ac.cn/ Contents The AME2016 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and referencesAcrobat PDF (293 KB) Table I. The 2016 Atomic mass tableAcrobat PDF (273 KB) Table II. Influences on primary nuclidesAcrobat PDF (160 KB) Table III. Nuclear-reaction and separation energiesAcrobat PDF (517 KB) Graphs of separation and decay energiesAcrobat PDF (589 KB) References used in the AME2016 and the NUBASE2016 evaluationsAcrobat PDF (722 KB)

High-precision QEC -value measurement of the superallowed β+ emitter Mg22 and an ab

“…1) with excitation times in the Penning trap of 500 ms for 22 Mg + , 22 Na + , and 23 Na + . Using these measurements the extracted mass-excess for 22 Mg and 22 Na, along with the direct 22 Mg→ 22 Na Q ECvalue measurement, are presented and compared to the most recent atomic mass evaluation (AME16) [38] and Hardy/Towner superallowed 0 + → 0 + review (HT15) [2] in Table II. The values presented in this work agree with the respective experimental reviews, but provide an increase in precision to the evaluated data in each case.…”

“…These interactions are TABLE II. The extracted mass excesses (∆) and 22 Mg QEC -value from this work (TITAN) are compared to the most recent values reported in the atomic mass evaluation (AME16) [38] and the Hardy/Towner superallowed 0 + → 0 + review (HT15) [2]. Using the prescription of Ref.…”

“…The resulting calculations of the IAS states are compared to the experimental data from this work and Ref. [38] in Fig. 2, including the 3 + ground state in 22 Na.…”

23Na(p,γ)24Mg Cross Section Measurements

“…As the environmental backgrounds in this energy region (Q = 11.693 MeV for 23 Na(p, γ) 24 Mg [5]) are very small, due to the underground location, the limiting factor for the sensitivity to this signature was beam-induced background. The reactions 11 B(p, γ) and 7 Li(p, γ) can both contribute to background in the 23 Na region of interest, as their Q-values are higher than the studied reaction on 23 Na.…”

KIDS Nuclear Energy Density Functional: 1st Application in Nuclei

“…For exotic nuclei 28 O and 60 Ca, the predicted results show model dependence. For example, the binding energies of 28 O are 6.0757 MeV (KIDS), 6.1925 MeV (SLy4), and 6.4114 MeV (SkM*), and 5.9883 MeV (AME2016, [6]). …”