1971
DOI: 10.11606/issn.2176-7793.v21i2p41-119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The american genera of Mydidae (Diptera), with the description of three new genera and two new species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“… Curran’s (1934) original description of Nemomydas and also the added generic characters by Wilcox and Papavero (1971) do also apply to Leptomydas species studied by me, i.e., the type species Leptomydas lusitanicus (Wiedemann, 1820) from Spain, Leptomydas sardous (Costa, 1884) from Italy, and Leptomydas turcicus Bowden, 1983 from Turkey. The only morphological differences I can find among Old World and New World species, are male terminalia characters (particularly the development of median gonocoxal appendages).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Curran’s (1934) original description of Nemomydas and also the added generic characters by Wilcox and Papavero (1971) do also apply to Leptomydas species studied by me, i.e., the type species Leptomydas lusitanicus (Wiedemann, 1820) from Spain, Leptomydas sardous (Costa, 1884) from Italy, and Leptomydas turcicus Bowden, 1983 from Turkey. The only morphological differences I can find among Old World and New World species, are male terminalia characters (particularly the development of median gonocoxal appendages).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Terminology follows Cumming & Wood (2009), for general morphology and Stuckenberg (1999) for antennal structures. The term "sensory area", as used by Wilcox & Papavero (1971), designates the sunken area near apex of antenna. A capital "T" and "S", followed by the abdominal segment number, are used to refer to "tergite" and "sternite" respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite having some features in common, Eumydas is easily distinguished from Paramydas (as described by Artigas & Palma 1979, Artigas & Papavero 1970, Wilcox & Papavero 1971,) by the following: head and scutum with dense pubescent areas {Paramydas has no dense pubescent area on body); katepimeron and anepisternum asetulose {Paramydas has a setulose katepimeron and anepisternum with setulae on dorsal an posterior margins); male abdomen predominantly orange (abdomen of Paramydas is black with blue or green metallic reflections); female TlO with acanthophorite spines {Paramydas is the only Apiophorinae with setulae instead of acanthophorite spines); abdomen without abdominal punctuation (deep and dense punctuation is exclusive oi Paramydas). …”
Section: Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The term "sensory area", as used by Wilcox & Papavero (1971), designates the sunken area near the apex of antenna, and "seta-like sensory element" indicates the small structure at postpedicel apex, which is possibly part of a reduced stylus (Dikow & Londt 2000). A capital "T" and "S", followed by the abdominal segment number, frequently substitute the terms "tergite" and "sternite", respectively.…”
Section: Terminologymentioning
confidence: 99%