The analysis and perspectives of studying basic and special types of self-determination according to A.L. Zhuravlev’s and A.B. Kupreichenko’s concept

Abstract

An analysis of Russian and foreign ways of understanding the phenomenon of self-determination has been performed. It has been found that the concept of individual and group self-determination by A.L. Zhuravlev and A.B. Kupreichenko is the most developed in modern Russian psychological science. Using the concept as a basis, the conceptual schemes (made by A.E. Vorobieva and A.A. Akbarova) of studies of personal, moral, social and economic self-determination were considered as the examples of the basic and special types of self-determination. Moral self-determination was studied with questions about ideas of morality, moral strategies and personality orientation, attitude toward unethical phenomena, ability for self-regulation and emotional intellect. Social and economic self-determination were studied with questions that show one's social level, satisfaction with economic and social status and their dynamics, a valuation of favorable circumstances for an increase of status and economic activity. Value and anti-value, spheres and forms of showing of social and living personality's activity were also determined. Fundamental differences (variability, success criteria, implementation in behavior, a level of ability to control a process, the role of external factors) and similarities (successfulness, a formation level, a range, dynamics, conceptions, strategy, values, factors) between the components of the conceptual schemes of these types of selfdetermination were identified. The principles of studying (proportion of basic and specific types of self-determination, a display of resultative, procedural and formal-dynamic characteristics, consideration of factors of different levels) of basic and special types of self-determination were suggested.

The Development Of Family Self-Determination Of Student’s Youth

“…There is a two-level structure determination A. L. Zhuravleva and A. B. Kupreychenko (Vorobieva & Akbarova, 2015). There is an issue of self-determination in the age aspect.…”

The Typology Of Modern Students’ Family Self-Determination

“…Personal self-determination is one of the key socio-economic mechanisms of personal maturity development, the essence of which is forming the ideals, moral principles, system of value and life-purpose orientations and making a conscious choice of norms and rules of behavior. Researchers distinguish between different spheres of self-determination: personal (Ginzburg, 1994;Orestova & Karabanova, 2005;Vorobieva & Akbarova, 2015), professional (Klimov, 2005;Prjazhnikov, 2017;Karabanova, 2016), family (Merzlyakova, 2015;Dubrovina, 2015), economic (Zhuravlev & Kupreychenko, 2013), civil and cultural (Batarchuk, 2014a(Batarchuk, , 2017 and more. The significance of adolescent and youthful age for getting identity, the formation of world outlook and system of value orientations is conventional for modern developmental psychology.…”

Family Self-Determination Of Students In The Process Of Professionalization

“…As a result of dynamic changes in modern society the interest in the study of self-determination (identity) of the individual has increased in domestic and foreign psychology. Scientists have developed several different aspects of self-determination: personal self-determination (Ginzburg, 1994;Orestova & Karabanova, 2005;Vorobieva & Akbarova, 2015), professional identity (Klimov, 2005;Prjazhnikov, 2017;Karabanova, 2016), family self-determination (Merzlyakova, 2015;, economic selfdetermination (Zhuravlev & Kupreychenko, 2013), civil-cultural identity (Batarchuk, 2014), multicultural identity (Batarchuk, 2017), gender identity (Zinchenko, Zotova, & Tarasova, 2017), and virtual identity (Asmolov & Asmolov, 2009). There are serious psychological problems associated with life choice and self-determination in the youth's environment.…”