2018
DOI: 10.11591/edulearn.v12i2.8124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Analysis of Learning Infrastructure (LI), Learning Motivation (LM) and Economics Learning Achievement (ELA)

Abstract: This research aimed to find out whether or not there is an effect of Learning Infrastructure (LI) and Learning M otivation (LM) on Economics Learning Achievement (ELA), and which one has more dominant effect on Learning Achievement, Learning Infrastructure or Learning M otivation. This study was a descriptive quantitative research with survey method. The data of LI, LM and ELA were collected using questionnaire. The population of research consisted of 1192 economics students in Public Senior High Schools of Se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides the findings, there is path coefficient value among the implementation of SF on ELA is about .370 or the correlation is about .597 which means there is a meaning in the effect among both latent variables. The findings in line to Setiawan, Martono, & Gunarhadi (2018); Odeh, Oguche, & Dondo (2015); Suleman & Hussain (2014); Adeogun & Olisaemeka (2011); Asvio, Arpinus & Suharmon (2017) wrote that there is a positive and significant effect in facility aspects and the school environment on ELA. Then according to Toha & Wulandari (2016), social environment and administration staff can impact students' enthusiasm in learning.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Besides the findings, there is path coefficient value among the implementation of SF on ELA is about .370 or the correlation is about .597 which means there is a meaning in the effect among both latent variables. The findings in line to Setiawan, Martono, & Gunarhadi (2018); Odeh, Oguche, & Dondo (2015); Suleman & Hussain (2014); Adeogun & Olisaemeka (2011); Asvio, Arpinus & Suharmon (2017) wrote that there is a positive and significant effect in facility aspects and the school environment on ELA. Then according to Toha & Wulandari (2016), social environment and administration staff can impact students' enthusiasm in learning.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…The study by Sawitri et al (2019) and Shirrell et al (2019) shows that physical infrastructure plays a crucial role in influencing student learning achievement. This is supported by other research conducted by Setiawan et al (2018), Shmis et al (2019), and Nafis and Muchtar (2020). However, research that specifically focuses on planning, implementation and evaluation of the management of educational facilities and infrastructure in public high schools is still limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…However, there is debate regarding how detailed such planning should be. Several researchers, as expressed by Setiawan et al (2018), argue that too many details in planning can lead to a waste of time and resources, while the focus should be more on flexibility and adaptation to changing needs that may occur in the future. On the other hand, a different opinion was expressed by Karim (2023), who emphasized that more detailed details in planning can provide clarity and ensure that all needs are met efficiently.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%