1972
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1972.tb00976.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Analysis of Mergers and Acquisitions

Abstract: 495 4. Examples of the first technique are [5, 12 and 14] and of the second technique are [1 and 7]. 5. This was pointed out by Weston and Mansinghka [14]. 6. The opposite bias is also potentially present. That is if the merging firm yielded a return above that of the sample before the merger and this return declined as a result of the merger, but not below the average, then this would be judged a successful merger. 7. In addition to these criticisms, some studies [1, 7] failed to include dividends. * 1967 is … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
references
References 10 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance