The Analysis of Students’ Pronunciation Error on English Diphthong Made by Fifth Semester of English Language Education Program Universitas Negeri Padang

Saadah, Fatihatus; Ardi, Havid

doi:10.24036/jelt.v9i1.107829

Cited by 32 publications

(37 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Ramelan (Saadah & Ardi, 2020). The two vowels that resulted from diphthong pronunciation have a loud center when pronounced the first vowel glides to the second vowel sound.…”

Section: Theorymentioning

confidence: 99%

Pronunciation Error on English Diphthongs Made by EFL Students

Pratiwi

Indrayani

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research addresses pronunciation errors of English diphthongs made by EFL students. The data were collected from pronunciation recordings of 9 post-graduate students who were studying linguistics in the second year. Three of the respondents were male and 6 female students. Studies show that different backgrounds and cultures affect sounds and sound styles as they are related to pronunciation or language styles. The purpose of this research was to analyze and describe the pronunciation errors of English diphthongs made by EFL students. Diphthong is divided into two types, namely GA (General American) and SSBE (Standard Southern British English) or commonly referred to as British accent. To collect the data, the researchers recorded students’ pronunciations using a smartphone. The data collected were then analyzed by employing qualitative and quantitative descriptive methods. The results show that 4 students used SSBE diphthong accent and 5 used GA diphthong accents. In this analysis, there were also 4 students who made pronunciation errors in pronouncing [eɪ], [ɛə], [ʊə] and [aɪ] diphthongs, 3 students had problems about [aʊ] and 2 students mispronounced [oʊ] diphthong.

show abstract

“…Ramelan (Saadah & Ardi, 2020). The two vowels that resulted from diphthong pronunciation have a loud center when pronounced the first vowel glides to the second vowel sound.…”

Section: Theorymentioning

confidence: 99%

Pronunciation Error on English Diphthongs Made by EFL Students

Pratiwi

Indrayani

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Error analysis is the linguistic analysis of errors made by language learners. The language error is a mismatch of the language elements used to communicate (Gass & Selinker, 2008;Kharmilah & Narius, 2019). So, error analysis is the process of identifying and classifying errors made by learners caused by mismatching elements of the use of the target language.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Students mostly experienced this error and was dominated by student negligence (40%). Meanwhile, at the tertiary level, other previous study examined error analysis in discussion texts written by Padang State University students who chose English majors (Kharmilah & Narius, 2019). The method applied was qualitative to identify grammatical errors.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Students’ Errors in E-Learning Discussion in TEFL Course and Their Responses

Ratminingsih

Santosa

Ana

2022

Indonesian J. Educ. Res. Rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Lack of knowledge, practice, and forgetfulness can also contribute to typographical errors. Writing errors will impact the information presented and cannot be appropriately channeled. This research aims to analyze the types of mistakes made by students using English and identify their responses to the errors made. This type of research is qualitative. The research method is a qualitative descriptive method. The sample was determined purposively, namely students in class 3A who were categorized as having superior English skills among other classes. The methods used in collecting data are observation and interviews. The instrument used is a questionnaire sheet. The data analysis technique used is qualitative and quantitative analysis. The study's results proved that there were 7554 errors from 1875 conversations. 3332 (44.11%) lexical errors, 474 (6.27%) grammatical errors, and 419 (5.54%) spelling errors. Additional findings include grammar or mechanics errors, as much as 3329. (44%). Student responses varied towards the mistakes made, including limited knowledge, forgetting English grammar concepts, accustomed to thinking in the native language (mother tongue) or translating, lack of using tenses in everyday life, the assumption that one does not need to master grammar, and limited time and rush in writing answers, as well as lack of accuracy.

show abstract

“…Speaking of the studies on the pronunciation issues in the EFL context, a wave of longstanding literature has mostly been centered on the students' errors in producing English sounds by emphasizing the matter of inquiry on the influence of first language or MT on English (Adila & Refnaldi, 2019;Cahriani, 2016;Dosia & Rido, 2017;Jaya, 2018;Kurniawan, 2016;Maizah, 2020;Saadah & Ardi, 2020). Interestingly, while the presence of the MT effect on English has been extensively carried out in the domain of pronunciation studies, account on the phonological role and process that highlights the changes of sound combinations in an utterance (Schane, 1973) has to date been somewhat overlooked in the literature of pronunciation studies.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Study on Phonologycal Process: A Case on Indonesian EFL Students' Pronunciations

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present article seeks to discuss the phonological process concerning the alterations in English sounds produced by Indonesian EFL students. This study drew on generative phonology and utilized Schane’s (1973) categories of the phonological process to highlight the changes in English sounds. This study applied a qualitative method with a descriptive research design. All data of this study were gathered through digitally recording eight EFL students’ oral presentations in the research proposal seminars. According to the results of this study, the transformations in the English sounds arose in both the consonant and vowel sounds of the English, where these changes attributed to the four categories of phonological process, including assimilation, dissimilation, deletion, and insertion. The present study also found the occurrences of a double and triple different phonological process in single word utterance produced by participants of this study. This study signified that such changes in English sounds occurred owing to the mother tongue influence. The results of this study offer a significant contribution to the insights into both linguistics and EFL instruction.

show abstract

The Analysis of Students’ Pronunciation Error on English Diphthong Made by Fifth Semester of English Language Education Program Universitas Negeri Padang

Cited by 32 publications

References 0 publications

Pronunciation Error on English Diphthongs Made by EFL Students

Pronunciation Error on English Diphthongs Made by EFL Students

Students’ Errors in E-Learning Discussion in TEFL Course and Their Responses

Study on Phonologycal Process: A Case on Indonesian EFL Students' Pronunciations

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About