1999
DOI: 10.1017/s1752756200002970
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The apparent digestibilities and rates of passage of two chop lengths of big bale silage and hay in ponies

Abstract: A wide range of roughage foodstuffs is available for feeding to horses. Considerable variation exists in the quality of these feeds in terms of nutrient composition and freedom from dust, fungal and bacterial contamination and infestation by mites. Many horse-owners are now feeding forages such as haylage and baled silage to horses as opposed to hay. However, limited information is available regarding the effect of chop length on digestibility and thus the feeding value of chopped or long-cut silage to horses.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When different chopped length of big bale silage (29.5 cm and 6.8 cm) were compared, the shortest MRT was associated with the shortest fibre length (Morrow et al, 1999;MooreColyer et al, 2003). Yet, no difference was found between 18 cm and 5.3 cm of ryegrass/timothy hay on digestibility or MRT (measured by YbCl 3 d 6 H 2 O, hence solid phase) in the same studies.…”
Section: Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When different chopped length of big bale silage (29.5 cm and 6.8 cm) were compared, the shortest MRT was associated with the shortest fibre length (Morrow et al, 1999;MooreColyer et al, 2003). Yet, no difference was found between 18 cm and 5.3 cm of ryegrass/timothy hay on digestibility or MRT (measured by YbCl 3 d 6 H 2 O, hence solid phase) in the same studies.…”
Section: Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O consumo diário de silagem (% massa corporal em matéria seca) foi de 1,74%, 1,90% e 3,06% para os animais alimentados com silagem de milho, sorgo e hemártria, respectivamente. Os valores encontrados para as silagens de milho e de sorgo estiveram muito próximos dos encontrados por Morrow et al (1999), Moore-Colyer e Longland (2000) e Bergero et al (2002), os quais avaliaram o consumo de silagens de gramíneas forrageiras por pôneis, e obtiveram valores entre 1,47% e 2,2%. Em revisão apresentada pelo National Research Council -NRC (2007), observa-se que a silagem de milho apresenta menor consumo voluntário, comparativamente a alguns tipos de silagens e de fenos.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified