2010
DOI: 10.1122/1.3473923
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The apparent yield stress of pulp fiber suspensions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
36
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
4
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Apparent yield stresses were determined from the flow curve at shear rates 20-502.4 1/s using the Herschel-Bulkley calculation (Herschel and Bulkley 1926;Barnes 1999) which has been used earlier for pulp fiber suspensions (Derakhshandeh et al 2010) and MFC suspensions (Lowys et al 2001). The Herschel-Bulkley equation is presented below:…”
Section: Rheological Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Apparent yield stresses were determined from the flow curve at shear rates 20-502.4 1/s using the Herschel-Bulkley calculation (Herschel and Bulkley 1926;Barnes 1999) which has been used earlier for pulp fiber suspensions (Derakhshandeh et al 2010) and MFC suspensions (Lowys et al 2001). The Herschel-Bulkley equation is presented below:…”
Section: Rheological Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that region, the suspension is certainly at the state that it flows. The validity of the yield stress concept has been under debate (Barnes 1999;Derakhshandeh et al 2010;Masalova et al 2008). We agree that the obtained value is dependent on determination method and therefore comparable rather than absolute material characteristic.…”
Section: Apparent Yield Stressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the development of the probability function including the effect of the yield stress of pulp fiber suspensions reported in experimental studies [3] will be a first step of the further study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the wall slip problem may be minimised by using rough surfaces, such as sand paper or serrated plates, this approach still includes the difficulties associated with sample loading (Derakhshandeh et al 2010a;2010b). Due to the above limitations, Barnes et al (1990) proposed the use of a vane-in-cup configuration to avoid the wall slip, which was adopted in this work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%