1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0301-6226(99)00050-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The application of digital imaging techniques in the in vivo estimation of the body composition of pigs: a review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
28
2
5

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
28
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Indirect methods are preferred for determining animal nutritional requirements or for studying the effect of nutrition on animal growth. However, indirect methods require calibration to accurately estimate body composition (Szabo et al, 1999;Mitchell et al, 2003;Mercier et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indirect methods are preferred for determining animal nutritional requirements or for studying the effect of nutrition on animal growth. However, indirect methods require calibration to accurately estimate body composition (Szabo et al, 1999;Mitchell et al, 2003;Mercier et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The carcass lean content is calculated from backfat thickness and longissimus muscle depth between the third and fourth last ribs, and these measurements are then converted into an estimate value of lean meat content by the respective equipment (Ministère des Classes Moyennes et de l 'Agricultur e , 1999). The correlation between backfat thickness, longissimus muscle depth and longissimus muscle area measured on carcasses, and those corresponding to live animal measurements done by real-time ultrasound, are high with good repeatability (McLaren et al, 1991;Fischer, 1997;Szabo et al, 1999). Ultrasonic techniques therefore offer the possibility of predicting carcass composition when animals are scanned in vivo (Sather et al, 1996 ;Szabo et al, 1999;Hulsegge et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been very few studies on the estimation of the pig chemical composition using CT technology. Szabo et al (1999) showed R 2 values for the fat (0.89), protein (0.83) and water (0.82) content in live animals, although they did not present prediction error values. The lower accuracy for protein can be explained by the narrow Pig chemical composition with computed tomography range of variation of the protein content in the present study in accordance with Prieto et al (2009) in NIRS, and also by analytical differences between the Kjeldahl methodology and CT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Computed tomography (CT) is a non-invasive technology that is based on the attenuation of X-rays as they pass through body tissues. Previous studies have proven that CT is a suitable method to estimate body composition in live pigs (Szabo et al, 1999;Font-i-Furnols et al, 2015) and carcasses (Font i Furnols et al, 2009). Szabo et al (1999) and Arthur et al (2011) showed the potential of this technology to measure the main chemical body components, but information on the relationship between CT and chemical composition is still limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%